Background/Aims:To compare the survival benefits of surgical resection (SR) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm.Patients and Methods:Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, a total of 461 patients who underwent SR and 575 patients who underwent RFA were enrolled from 2004 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) and liver-cancer-specific survival (LCSS) comparisons were conducted between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).Results:Elderly patients with early-stage HCC had a lower rate of utilization of liver transplantation, and they were more likely to receive SR or RFA as their first-line treatment compared with younger patients (P < 0.05). In the whole cohort, the SR group had significantly better OS [RFA, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.680 (1.390, 2.031), P < 0.001] and LCSS (RFA, HR = 1.658 (1.327, 2.070), P < 0.001) than the RFA group. After PSM, the improved survival in the SR group was further confirmed (all P < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, according to patients' age (65–75, >75 years) and tumor size (≤3.0, 3.1–5.0 cm), the SR group still presented better OS and LCSS than the RFA group (all P < 0.05), except for those older than 75 years with tumors ≤3.0 cm (all P > 0.05), both before and after PSM.Conclusion:Treatment strategies for elderly patients (≥65 years) with single HCC ≤5 cm should emphasize SR as the primary therapy, while RFA can be an alternative to SR for those >75 years with single HCC ≤3 cm.
Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) is a congenital, benign, epithelial tumor and mainly occurs in sellar region and occasionally in suprasellar region; ectopic RCC is exceedingly rare. We report an uncommon RCC in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) associated with RCC apoplexy and investigated the possible hypothesis of its origin. A 12-year-old female student was admitted to hospital for 3-month history of vertigo, headache, nausea, and vomiting and aggravated for 1 week. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a space-occupying lesion with short T1 and long T2 signals in the left CPA and an intracystic floating nodule with hypointensity on T1- and T2-weighted imaging. The patient underwent the total tumor removal via the retrosigmoid approach with a good recovery. Primary RCC was confirmed by pathology. Follow-up MRI showed no recurrence 3.5 years after craniotomy. Primary RCC can occur in CPA and present special neuroimaging features associated with RCC apoplexy. We presumed that a mimicking mechanism of ectopic craniopharyngioma in CPA leads to the formation in the present case. Microsurgical resection is the optimal strategy for management. Further research and longer follow-up are helpful to better understanding the pathogenesis and development history of RCC in CPA.
The joint of high-voltage cable is the weakest part in the whole cable system, and the local defect of the middle joint will affect the distribution of the internal electric field. This paper establishes a three-dimensional model by finite element simulation software based on the electric field calculation equation in Maxwell equation system. The influence of typical defects such as impurity, scratch and air bubble on the electric field distribution in the middle joint is analysed. The results show that the internal defects of the middle joint may cause distortion of the local electric field strength in the middle joint, which may lead to deterioration of the insulation.
Importance: Multiple nutritional therapies are currently available for patients with liver cirrhosis, yet many interventions have not been compared head-to-head within randomized clinical trials. Objective: To evaluate the improvement of nutritional indicators and liver function indexes of liver cirrhosis treated with different nutrition intervention. Data source: We searched PubMed, Embase. com and Cochrane Library database from construction to April 3, 2020. After eliminating the duplicated or overlapping reports, 6 studies were included. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis by Stata 12.0 and GeMTC 0.14.3 in order to compare different nutritional interventions with consistency model. Study selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing 2 or more therapies in patients with cirrhosis were evaluated. Six randomized clinical trials met the selection criteria. Data extraction and synthesis: Two investigators independently reviewed the full manuscripts of eligible studies and extracted information into an electronic database: patients’ characteristics study design, interventions, the number of events of interest in each group. Main outcomes and measures: Body mass index, Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease score, total bilirubin, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, total protein, Triceps skinfold, Midarm Muscle Circumference, Fischer ratio, overall survival. Results: There are 6 studies enrolling a total of 1148 patients who received different nutrition supports including parenteral nutrition (PN), enteral nutrition (EN), EN (without branched-chain amino acids), EN + intestinal probiotics, PN + EN, late evening snacks (LES), EN + LES, noLES. The direct comparisons showed that the effect of EN was better than EN (without branched-chain amino acids); EN + intestinal probiotics was better than EN and PN; PN + EN was better than them alone; EN + LES was better than LES and EN; LES was better than noLES. Although the difference of indirect comparisons between the included regimens was not statistically significant, the results showed that EN + intestinal probiotics appeared to be superior to PN + EN. While LES and EN + LES seemed to rank behind them and the difference between them was extremely small. Conclusion and relevance: Available evidence suggests that EN + intestinal probiotics appear to be the most effective strategy for patients with cirrhosis compared with other interventions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.