The Mangling intrusive complex has different dioritic to granitic phases and is spatially and temporally related to molybdenum deposits in the Qinling Orogen. Zircon U-Pb dating of the Mangling intrusive complex indicates that dioritic rocks (biotite diorite and biotite diorite enclave; ca. 150−147 Ma) formed earlier than granitic rocks (medium- to fine-grained and fine-grained monzogranite and K-feldspar granite; ca. 145−141 Ma). The Mangling dioritic rocks exhibit large ion lithosphere element (e.g., Rb) and light rare earth element enrichment and high field strength element (e.g., Nb, Ta, and Ti) depletion. They have low to moderate SiO2 (51.33−58.16 wt%), high MgO (3.10−4.75 wt%) and Mg# (48−60), and negative zircon εHf(t) values (−11.6 to −6.8), suggesting origination from the continental lithospheric mantle that may have been metasomatized by previous sediment-derived melts and slab-derived fluids constrained by high Nb/Y, Th/Yb, and Rb/Y ratios. The Mangling granitic rocks are I-type granites and have high SiO2 (67.90−81.88 wt%) and low MgO (0.16−0.74 wt%). They have low and negative zircon εHf(t) values (−18.7 to −1.9) and old zircon Hf two-stage model ages (2334−1287 Ma), as well as similar mineral fractionation (e.g., hornblende, biotite, sphene, and apatite) with the Mangling dioritic rocks, indicating that they were derived from the remelting of old crustal rocks (e.g., Xiong’er and Kuanping groups) by the evolved underplated mafic magma. Compared with the Taoguanping mineralized monzogranite in the Northern Qinling Belt, zircon geochemistry (e.g., Ce4+/Ce3+, Eu/Eu*, and ΔFMQ [relative fayalite-magnetite-quartz buffer]) indicates that magma of the Mangling intrusive complex (except the biotite diorite) has high oxygen fugacity and small fractionated granitic intrusions, which are coeval with the biotite diorite enclave or younger than the Mangling granitic rocks, may have potential for generating porphyry molybdenum mineralization. The combination of this study and previous studies corroborates that the Qinling Orogen underwent an intracontinental orogenic evolution in a post-collisional compression to extension transitional setting during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, affected by far-field Paleo-Pacific slab subduction.
A suite of mafic intrusions, composed of diabase and micro-gabbro outcrops in the Jingxi area of southern Youjiang Basin, SW China. This study conducts geochronological, geochemical, and Sr–Nd isotopic analyses on the mafic intrusions in Jingxi with the aim of determining their petrogenesis, tectonic setting, and metallogenic implications. Zircon U–Pb dating for the mafic intrusions yielded an age of 183 ± 3 Ma (MSWD = 2.3), which is coeval with the Carlin-like gold mineralization in the Youjiang Basin. The mafic intrusions are alkaline in composition and characterized by low TiO2 (1.25–1.87 wt %) contents and low Ti/Y ratios (410–550). They exhibit OIB-like patterns of trace element distribution and they have low (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios of 0.704341 to 0.705677, slightly negative εNd(t) values of −0.30 to −2.16, low La/Ta (11.57–15.66) and La/Nb (0.77–1.06) ratios, with [La/Yb]N = 6.52–10.63. The geochemical characteristics, combined with regional considerations, suggest that the mafic intrusions originated from partial melting of upwelling asthenosphere within the garnet-spinel transition zone, as a result of intracontinental back-arc extension triggered by the steep subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate beneath the South China Block. Moreover, the new data not only suggest Early Jurassic magma was a possible heat source, but also support a magmatism-related model for the Carlin-like gold mineralization in the Youjiang Basin.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.