No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Understanding vulnerabilities in complex and interdependent modern food systems requires a wholesystem perspective. This paper demonstrates how one systems approach, system dynamics, can help conceptualize the mechanisms and pathways by which food systems can be affected by disturbances. We describe the process of creating stock-and-flow maps and causal loop diagrams from the graphical representation of a problem and illustrate their use for making links and feedback among the human health, food, and environmental health sectors visible. These mapping tools help structure thinking about where and how particular systems might be affected by different disturbances and how flows of material and information transmit the effects of disturbances throughout the system. The visual representations as well as the process of creating them can serve different purposes for different stakeholders: developing research questions, identifying policy leverage points, or building collaboration among people in different parts of the system. They can serve as a transition between mental models and formal simulation models, but they also stand on their own to support diagrammatic reasoning: clarifying assumptions, structuring a problem space, or identifying unexpected implications of an unplanned disturbance or an intentional policy intervention. The diagrams included here show that vulnerability of a national food system does not only or automatically result from exogenous shocks that might affect a country. Rather, vulnerability can be either intensified or reduced by the interaction of feedback loops in the food system, and buffered or amplified by the structure of stocks and flows. KeywordsCausal loop diagram; conceptual models; dynamic complexity; modern industrialized food systems; stock-and-flow diagram; systems mapping, structural insights. 2 IntroductionFood supply systems are richly integrated and highly dynamic social-ecological systems in which ecological factors shape the possibilities for food production and social factors govern the goals and operations of actors in the system. In low income countries, food supply systems tend to be relatively simple and closely adapted to local environmental conditions, with a small set of products and few steps between producers and consumers. Consumers are likely to participate in the system and understand how it works. By contrast, the structure and operation of modern industrialized food systems are largely invisible to consumers and policy-makers (Reisch et al. 2013). The chains of production, processing, and distribution activities that generate food supplies are long, highly differentiated, and influenced by an array of environmental, economic, social, cultural and other factors. It is hard to visualize connections in the system and even harder to see how changes in one part of the system affect other parts. Some causal connections in the system are direct and obvious, such as the effect of a drought on crop yield, but some are indirect and opaque, such as the effect of...

Abstract:In a world of growing complexity and uncertainty, food systems must be resilient, i.e., able to deliver sustainable and equitable food and nutrition security in the face of multiple shocks and stresses. The resilience of the European food system that relies mostly on conventional agriculture is a matter of genuine concern and a new approach is called for. Does then organic farming have the potential to reduce vulnerabilities and improve the resilience of the European food system to shocks and stresses? In this paper, we use system dynamics structural thinking tools to identify the vulnerabilities of the conventional food system that result from both its internal structure as well as its exposure to external disturbances. Further, we evaluate whether organic farming can reduce the vulnerabilities. We argue here that organic farming has some potential to bring resilience to the European food system, but it has to be carefully designed and implemented to overcome the contradictions between the dominant socio-economic organization of food production and the ability to enact all organic farming's principles-health, ecology, fairness and care-on a broader scale.