The prevalence of overall use of medication in Dutch pregnant and lactating women admitted to a tertiary center was high. There is an urgent need for pharmacometric studies for determination of the safe use of the most frequently used medicines during pregnancy or lactation.

Objective To investigate disease activity around and during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) considering antiphospholipid antibody status. Moreover, differences between first and consecutive pregnancies were examined. Methods Pregnancies > 16 weeks gestation of SLE patients receiving joint care from rheumatologists and gynecologists in two tertiary centers in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2015 were included. Disease activity, flare rate, and pregnancy outcomes and complications were assessed. Results Ninety-six women (84% Caucasian) with 144 pregnancies were included. The median SLE(P)DAI score was 2 before, during, and after pregnancy. Flare rates were 6.3%, 20.1%, and 15.3%, respectively. Severe hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, intrauterine fetal death, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational age infants occurred in 18.1%, 4.1%, 32.7%, and 14.8%, respectively. Complication rates were similar in the first and consecutive pregnancies. Half of the women did not experience any pregnancy complication whereas 42.7% developed a complication during all pregnancies. Mean number of pregnancies was 2.4 and live births 1.7. Conclusion In this SLE population with low disease activity, pregnancy complications were present irrespective of antiphospholipid antibody status. Furthermore, there were no differences in complication rates between the first and consecutive pregnancies as seen in healthy mothers. This information is useful for patient counseling.

No abstract

BackgroundThe Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score was developed as a European League Against Rheumatism initiative to obtain a patient reported outcome score for clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on patients’ perception of the impact of the disease on several domains of health. The objective of this study was to assess the content validity of this score in Dutch RA patients.MethodsDuring three focus group discussions (n = 23), patients with RA reflected on comprehensiveness of the RAID to measure impact of RA on their life, relevance of the RAID domains and formulation of questions. Also, the domains of the RAID score were compared to the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set for RA.ResultsPatients confirmed that RA had impact on five domains already incorporated in the RAID score: emotional well-being, pain, performing daily activities, fatigue and coping. There was variation in interpretation of some of the items of the RAID score, suggesting problems in comprehension. Patients indicated that the domains work, relationships with others (such as family and friends) and spare time/hobbies were missed in the RAID and could be added to obtain a more ‘complete’ picture of the impact of the disease.ConclusionThe RAID score has fairly good content validity. If confirmed as important in other patient groups, items in the above mentioned areas should be considered in a future upgrade.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0911-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective: To identify predictors of sick leave and improved worker productivity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated for 52 weeks with intensive combination strategies. Methods: Patients with early RA were included in the COmbinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis (COBRA)-light trial and followed for 52 weeks. As the COBRA-light strategy proved to be non-inferior to the COBRA strategy, all patients were pooled. Predictors for sick leave and improved worker productivity were assessed through a 3 month time-lag multivariable logistic generalized estimating equations model. Results: At baseline, 97 patients had a paid job, 59 had no job, and for six patients the work status was unknown. During the trial, 13 patients stopped working (8%) and six started working (4%). Only sick leave in the past 3 months predicted sick leave. By excluding this variable, patient global assessment and actual hours of sick leave became predictors. Increased worker productivity was predicted by higher patient global assessment levels, Sharp van der Heijde score ≥ 1, actual hours on sick leave, and higher worker productivity in the past 3 months. Conclusion: Sick leave and improved worker productivity were mainly predicted by non-disease-specific variables. Both outcomes can be predicted on a 3 month basis, using the outcome over the past 3 months for the next 3 months. By applying this model in daily practice, decisions for therapy change could be based not solely on disease activity but also taking into account a possible high risk for sick leave in the upcoming 3 months.