Objective: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been described in 1983, and its superiority over open appendectomy (OA) is still being debated. Currently, there is no agreement on the advantages of LA. Postoperative pain is reported to be lower along with a faster return to normal activities in LA. However, some studies do not support these findings. In our study, we aimed to compare the outcomes and cost effectiveness of LA and OA. Material and Methods:Patients were prospectively randomized into LA (31 patients) and OA (32 patients) groups. Demographic data, pre-and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, white blood cell (WBC) count, duration of surgery and hospitalization, complications, and pain scores (VAS) were recorded. Cost was calculated for both groups. Return to normal activities was evaluated by phone calls at the first and second week and 1 month after surgery.Results: There was a significant postoperative decrease in WBC count in the LA group (p<0.01). There were no differences between LA and OA groups in terms of postoperative CRP levels (p>0.05). The rates of wound infection and abscess were similar (p>0.05), while post-operative pain and time to return to normal activities were higher in the OA group (p<0.01). There was a positive correlation between BMI and operative time in the LA group (p<0.01), while BMI and operative time did not show a correlation in the OA group (p>0,05). The average cost in the LA and OA groups were 1960.5±339.05 and 687.115±159.5 TL, respectively. Conclusion:LA is an effective method in the treatment of acute appendicitis due to less pain and faster recovery. LA can be the choice of treatment in acute appendicitis, with utilization of re-useable and cheaper vascular sealing devices.

Background/Aim: The omentum has an important role as part of peritoneal defense mechanisms. The aim of this study is to show the bactericidal activity of peritoneal fluid and the role of the omentum as a peritoneal defense mechanism in experimental animals with intra-abdominal infections. Methods: 40 male Spraque-Dawley rats weighing between 250 and 300 g were used in this study. The rats were randomly divided into four groups consisting of 10 animals. The operative procedures were done under sterile conditions. In group I sham laparotomy was done. In group II, the distal part of the cecum was ligated, and cecum perforation was performed. In group III, total omentectomy was performed after cecal ligation and perforation. In group IV only omentectomy was performed. Baseline and 2- and 4-hour peritoneal fluid samples were taken using a Pasteur pipette during laparotomy under anesthesia. Total peritoneal cells counts, bactericidal activity of peritoneal fluid, and types of phagocytic cells in the peritoneal fluid were assessed. Results: As compared with baseline values, the total peritoneal cell counts were increased at the 2nd and 4th h in all groups (p < 0.05). A significant increase was observed after 4 h as compared with 2 h in sham laparotomy, cecal ligation+perforation+omentectomy, and omentectomy groups (p < 0.05). A significant increase in the cell counts after 2 h was found in the other groups when compared to the sham laparotomy group (p = 0.0001). After 4 h, there was a significant difference between the groups, but especially prominent in the cecum ligation+perforation+omentectomy group (p = 0.0001). Proliferating colony counts of Escherichiacoli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa decreased after 2 h, and there was no proliferation in the subsequent cultures. It was observed that the macrophage counts significantly increased after 2 and 4 h as compared with baseline in intragroup assessments (p = 0.0001). In the intergroup assessment, an increase was observed in the macrophage counts at baseline and after 2 and 4 h, and this was significant in the cecal ligation+perforation+omentectomy group (p = 0.0001). In the omentectomy group, a significant decrease was observed in the macrophage counts between the 2nd and 4th h (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Removal of the omentum in the presence of intra-abdominal infections causes the peripherally derived macrophages to take over the defensive role of macrophages of peritoneal origin as a compensatory mechanism, thus the peritoneal bactericidal activity against E. coli, the major pathogen in intra-abdominal infections, does not change after omentectomy.

No abstract

During laparoscopy, the main problems of patients who have undergone previous abdominoplasty are inadequate pneumoperitoneum secondary to fibrosis and reconstructed anatomic landmarks for trocar placement. In this study, we present our laparoscopic bariatric experience in two patients with previous abdominoplasty. The procedures were a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and a robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Both operations were done successfully by an abdominal wall traction technique, cutting fibrotic tissue and choosing new landmarks. We conclude that after abdominoplasty bariatric surgery can be performed safely either using conventional laparoscopic technique or robotically.

No abstract