Background Mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is high, therefore, it is essential to evaluate the independent effect of new‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) on mortality in patients with COVID‐19. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of NOAF in a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Methods We conducted a retrospective study on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of COVID‐19. NOAF was defined as atrial fibrillation that was detected after diagnosis of COVID‐19 without a prior history. The primary outcome of the study was the effect of NOAF on mortality in critically ill COVID‐19 patients. Results NOAF incidence was 14.9% (n = 37), and 78% of patients (n = 29) were men in NOAF positive group. Median age of the NOAF group was 79.0 (interquartile range, 71.5‐84.0). Hospital mortality was higher in the NOAF group (87% vs 67%, respectively, P = .019). However, in multivariate analysis, NOAF was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.40‐5.09, P = .582). Conclusions The incidence of NOAF was 14.9% in critically ill COVID‐19 patients. Hospital mortality was higher in the NOAF group. However, NOAF was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality in patients with COVID‐19.

Objectives: To determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in a cohort of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of COVID-19. NOAF was defined as atrial fibrillation that was detected after diagnosis of COVID-19 without a prior history. The primary outcome of the study was the effect of NOAF on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Results: We enrolled 248 eligible patients. NOAF incidence was 14.9% (n=37), and 78% of patients (n=29) were men in NOAF positive group. Median age of the NOAF group was 79.0 (interquartile range, 71.5-84.0). Hospital mortality was higher in the NOAF group (87% vs 67%, respectively, p=0.019). However, in multivariate analysis, NOAF was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.40–5.09, p=0.582) Conclusions: The incidence of NOAF was 14.9% in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Hospital mortality was higher in the NOAF group. However, NOAF was not an independent risk factor for hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, critical care, intensive care unit, COVID-19, mortality, hospital mortality

Aim of the study:To investigate the disease-specific score and improve the existing scores to better determine the prognosis of patients after liver transplantation (LT). For this purpose, we evaluated the relationship of prognostic scores with 30-day mortality after LT. In addition, we planned to investigate whether the mean platelet volume/platelet count (MPR) would contribute to score improvement. Material and methods: A total of 178 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit after LT in our hospital between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELDNa), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, and MPR values were compared in patients with and without 30-day mortality who underwent LT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors for mortality. A model was created with multivariate analysis. Results: Our study included 135 (75.8%) male and 43 (24.2%) female patients. There was a significant difference in the postLT-MELDNa score in the evaluation between those with and without mortality (p < 0.001). Age, postLT-MELDNa and CTP score were found to be significant in terms of the prediction of 30-day mortality in the univariate analysis (p < 0.05). mean platelet volume (MPV) and MPR were not significant in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed a model in which age and postLT-MELDNa were significant. Conclusions: In our study, postLT-MELDNa predicted 30-day mortality and was much more effective in predicting mortality when evaluated with age. The MELDNa score, which is currently used in the prognosis of candidates awaiting LT, may be useful for the prognosis of patients after LT in intensive care units.

No abstract

No abstract