We evolved muscarinic receptors in yeast to generate a family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are activated solely by a pharmacologically inert drug-like and bioavailable compound (clozapine-N-oxide). Subsequent screening in human cell lines facilitated the creation of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine GPCRs suitable for in vitro and in situ studies. We subsequently created lines of telomerase-immortalized human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells stably expressing all five family members and found that each one faithfully recapitulated the signaling phenotype of the parent receptor. We also expressed a G i-coupled designer receptor in hippocampal neurons (hM 4D) and demonstrated its ability to induce membrane hyperpolarization and neuronal silencing. We have thus devised a facile approach for designing families of GPCRs with engineered ligand specificities. Such reverse-engineered GPCRs will prove to be powerful tools for selectively modulating signal-transduction pathways in vitro and in vivo.cell engineering ͉ molecular evolution ͉ receptorome B ecause of the assorted cellular responses directed by them, their number, and the ease of which they are pharmacologically screened, the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is one of the most therapeutically important targets in the proteome (1). However, the potential of this family is restricted by our ability to assess their function, which currently involves transgenic, knockout, and/or in vivo studies with selective drugs. Genetic studies are frequently limited to loss-of-function phenotypes, whereas nonselectiveness of a drug often interferes with interpretation of pharmacological studies. Knowledge of the roles of the individual family members is being bolstered by the ongoing creation of knockout mice for many GPCRs. Selective activation of individual GPCR subtypes in a defined tissue, in either a knockout or wild-type animal, is currently problematic but, if possible, would serve to complement present findings by providing novel insights into disease states resulting from overstimulation of certain signaling pathways.One approach to this problem has been to rationally modify receptors to favor synthetic over natural substrate/ligand recognition, and subsequently, these mutant proteins have been used as bio-tools to study protein function in complex biological environments (2, 3). At the forefront of such modified GPCRs is Ro1, a G i/o -coupled opioid receptor activated by a synthetic but not a native ligand, which has been conditionally expressed in transgenic mice to study cardiac function after its selective activation (4). Such mutant receptors, like Ro1, have been classified as receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSLs), because they are activated by synthetic ligands but not by their endogenous ligands (5). RASSLs, as in the case of Ro1, have been demonstrated to be valuable tools (4, 6); however, because the synthetic ligand frequently has high affinity and/or potency at the native receptor (5,7,8), this pote...
The identification of protein function based on biological information is an area of intense research. Here we consider a complementary technique that quantitatively groups and relates proteins based on the chemical similarity of their ligands. We began with 65,000 ligands annotated into sets for hundreds of drug targets. The similarity score between each set was calculated using ligand topology. A statistical model was developed to rank the significance of the resulting similarity scores, which are expressed as a minimum spanning tree to map the sets together. Although these maps are connected solely by chemical similarity, biologically sensible clusters nevertheless emerged. Links among unexpected targets also emerged, among them that methadone, emetine and loperamide (Imodium) may antagonize muscarinic M3, alpha2 adrenergic and neurokinin NK2 receptors, respectively. These predictions were subsequently confirmed experimentally. Relating receptors by ligand chemistry organizes biology to reveal unexpected relationships that may be assayed using the ligands themselves.
Examining the behavioral consequences of selective CNS neuronal activation is a powerful tool for elucidating mammalian brain function in health and disease. Newly developed genetic, pharmacological, and optical tools allow activation of neurons with exquisite spatiotemporal resolution; however, the inaccessibility to light of widely-distributed neuronal populations and the invasiveness required for activation by light or infused ligands limit the utility of these methods. To overcome these barriers, we created transgenic mice expressing an evolved G protein-coupled receptor (hM3Dq) selectively activated by the pharmacologically inert, orally bioavailable drug clozapine-N-oxide (CNO). Here, we expressed hM3Dq in forebrain principal neurons. Local field potential and single neuron recordings revealed that peripheral administration of CNO activated hippocampal neurons selectively in hM3Dq-expressing mice. Behavioral correlates of neuronal activation included increased locomotion, stereotypy, and limbic seizures. These results demonstrate a novel and powerful chemical-genetic tool for remotely controlling the activity of discrete populations of neurons in vivo.
Impaired functioning of pancreatic  cells is a key hallmark of type 2 diabetes.  cell function is modulated by the actions of different classes of heterotrimeric G proteins. The functional consequences of activating specific  cell G protein signaling pathways in vivo are not well understood at present, primarily due to the fact that  cell G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are also expressed by many other tissues. To circumvent these difficulties, we developed a chemicalgenetic approach that allows for the conditional and selective activation of specific  cell G proteins in intact animals. Specifically, we created two lines of transgenic mice each of which expressed a specific designer GPCR in  cells only. Importantly, the two designer receptors differed in their G protein-coupling properties (Gq/11 versus Gs). They were unable to bind endogenous ligand(s), but could be efficiently activated by an otherwise pharmacologically inert compound (clozapine-N-oxide), leading to the conditional activation of either  cell Gq/11 or Gs G proteins. Here we report the findings that conditional and selective activation of  cell Gq/11 signaling in vivo leads to striking increases in both first-and second-phase insulin release, greatly improved glucose tolerance in obese, insulin-resistant mice, and elevated  cell mass, associated with pathway-specific alterations in islet gene expression levels. Selective stimulation of  cell Gs triggered qualitatively similar in vivo metabolic effects. Thus, this developed chemical-genetic strategy represents a powerful approach to study G protein regulation of  cell function in vivo.beta cells ͉ G protein-coupled receptors ͉ transgenic mice ͉ type 2 diabetes T ype 2 diabetes has emerged as one of the major threats to human health in the 21st century (1). Impaired function of pancreatic  cells is one of the key hallmarks of type 2 diabetes, and therapies targeted at improving  cell function are predicted to offer considerable therapeutic benefit (2). Cell function is modulated by the actions of different classes of heterotrimeric G proteins which are the immediate downstream targets of a multitude of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Like most other cell types, pancreatic  cells are predicted to express many different GPCRs (3-5). Several lines of evidence suggest that activation of G s -coupled receptors expressed by pancreatic  cells, including the glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) receptor, improves  cell function and can increase in  cell mass via cAMP-dependent mechanisms (5-7). Pancreatic  cells also express several G q/11 -coupled receptors, including the M 3 muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (M3R) and GPR40, which can promote insulin release in an agonist-dependent fashion [for recent reviews, see (5,8)].Studies with GLP-1 receptor agonists have yielded detailed information about the beneficial effects of G s signaling on  cell function and whole body glucose homeostasis (note that the GLP-1 receptor is enriched in pancreatic  cells) (5-7). In contrast, much...
Most tumor cells depend upon activation of the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase for telomere maintenance and continual proliferation. The catalytic activity of this enzyme can be reconstituted in vitro with the RNA (hTR) and catalytic (hTERT) subunits. However, catalytic activity alone is insufficient for the full in vivo function of the enzyme. In addition, the enzyme must localize to the nucleus, recognize chromosome ends, and orchestrate telomere elongation in a highly regulated fashion. To identify domains of hTERT involved in these biological functions, we introduced a panel of 90 N-terminal hTERT substitution mutants into telomerasenegative cells and assayed the resulting cells for catalytic activity and, as a marker of in vivo function, for cellular proliferation. We found four domains to be essential for in vitro and in vivo enzyme activity, two of which were required for hTR binding. These domains map to regions defined by sequence alignments and mutational analysis in yeast, indicating that the N terminus has also been functionally conserved throughout evolution. Additionally, we discovered a novel domain, DAT, that "dissociates activities of telomerase," where mutations left the enzyme catalytically active, but was unable to function in vivo. Since mutations in this domain had no measurable effect on hTERT homomultimerization, hTR binding, or nuclear targeting, we propose that this domain is involved in other aspects of in vivo telomere elongation. The discovery of these domains provides the first step in dissecting the biological functions of human telomerase, with the ultimate goal of targeting this enzyme for the treatment of human cancers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.