A multi‐center, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of butenafine, a fungicidal benzylamine derivative, in the once daily treatment of interdigital tinea pedis.
One hundred and fifty patients with interdigital tinea pedis characterized by a minimum erythema score of 2 and a minimum score of 2 for either pruritus or scaling (on a scale of 0–3, where ‘2’ defines moderate severity) were initially enrolled, pending confirmation by mycologic culture and KOH testing. Patients were excluded if the evaluation of tinea pedis might have been impaired by concomitant conditions, if they were hypersensitive to allylamines or ingredients of the study medications, or if they had clinically significant abnormal laboratory values. Women of childbearing potential were also excluded if they were pregnant, lactating, or not using adequate contraceptive measures.
The patients were randomized and given study formulations in coded tubes containing either butenafine hydrochloride cream 1% (butenafine) or the vehicle. They were instructed to apply the formulation to all tinea pedis lesions one daily, for 4 weeks. They were evaluated after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of treatment, and again 4 weeks post‐treatment, using the following measures: (i) mycologic cure: negative fungal culture and KOH test; (ii) effective treatment: mycologic cure and investigator global assessment of 80% or more improvement in signs and symptoms; (iii) investigator global assessment of clinical response: cleared (100% improvement in signs and symptoms), excellent (80–99% improvement), good (50–79% improvement), fair (25–49% improvement), poor (less than 25% improvement), unchanged, or worse, (iv) patient’s assessment of change since baseline: 5=greatly improved, 4=somewhat improved, 3=the same, 2=somewhat worse, and 1=much worse.
Mycologic cure and effective treatment were each analyzed using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) test of response by treatment partialled on investigator. Patient perceptions and investigator evaluations of global response were analyzed as ordered categorical data using the CMH mean score test with uniform scores.
