Background : Implementation of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DACPR) has increased the likelihood of bystander CPR upon cardiac arrest. However, the quality of CPR has been found to be very low. In this study, we aimed to compare CPR quality between the current DACPR practices and the interventional instruction of adding verbal encouragement from the dispatcher. Methods : In this randomized controlled trial, we recruited adult (age ≥18) laypersons who were non-health care providers and had never received any previous verified CPR training. They were randomly selected to perform DACPR using metronome sounds (mDACPR) as per the standard protocol, or DACPR with metronome sounds along with human encouragement (mheDACPR). The ratio of accurate compression rate, depth, and complete release for each CPR phase was examined. Results: Sixty nine records (34, mDACPR; 35, mheDACPR) were taken. The median proportion of accurate chest compression rate was initially 29.5% with mDACPR, and significantly increased to 71% after 2 minutes of CPR administration ( P = .046). However, the median ratio of accurate chest compression depth was 61.5% in the first phase, and significantly decreased to 0% in the last phase ( P < .001). In contrast, for the mheDACPR group, a high accurate compression rate was maintained throughout the 2 minutes of CPR administration (91%, 100%, 100%, 100%). Conclusion : To maintain the quality of CPR administered by bystanders, continuous feedback and repeated human encouragement should be provided during DACPR. Active dispatcher intervention reduces the time required to reach an appropriate CPR rate and allows for the maintenance of accurate compression rates.

No abstract

Purpose: The social environment of easy access to medicines and arbitrary personal decisions leading to overdose aggravate unintentional medicine poisoning. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients who visited emergency departments with unintentional medicine poisoning and reasons for poisoning based on age group. Methods: We retrospectively collected patients who experienced unintentional medicine poisoning based on data from the national injury surveillance system between 2013 and 2016. Subjects were classified into three groups based on age (0-14 years, 15-64 years, and ${geq}65;years$). We identified sex, insurance, time of poisoning, place, alcohol co-ingestion, hospitalization, death, and reason for poisoning in each age group. Results: A total of 27,472 patients visited an emergency department with poisoning during the study period; 1,958 patients who experienced unintentional poisoning were enrolled in this study. Respiratory medicine was the most frequent medicine in those younger than 15 years of age, and sedatives and antipsychotic drugs were the most common in patients older than 15 years of age. In total, 35.1% of patients older than 65 years were hospitalized. The most common reasons for poisoning were careless storage of medicine in those younger than 15 years of age and overdose due to arbitrary decisions in those older than 15 years of age. Conclusion: Unintentional medicine poisoning has distinct characteristics based on age group, and strategies to prevent poisoning should be approached differently based on age.