In many tissues, cell type varies over single-cell length-scales, creating detailed heterogeneities fundamental to physiological function. To gain understanding of the relationship between tissue function and detailed structure, and eventually...
Purpose: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is being explored in biological contexts that require accurate and reproducible quantification of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs). While many groups have focused on improving imager and SPION design to improve resolution and sensitivity, few have focused on improving quantification and reproducibility of MPI. The aim of this study was to compare MPI quantification results by two different systems and the accuracy of SPION quantification performed by multiple users at two institutions. Procedures: Six users (3 from each institute) imaged a known amount of Vivotrax+ (10 micrograms Fe), diluted in a small (10 microliter) or large (500 microliter) volume. These samples were imaged with or without calibration standards in the field of view, to create a total of 72 images (6 users x triplicate samples x 2 sample volumes x 2 calibration methods). These images were analyzed by the respective user with two region of interest (ROI) selection methods. Image intensities, Vivotrax+ quantification, and ROI selection was compared across users, within and across institutions. Results: MPI imagers at two different institutes produce significantly different signal intensities, that differ by over 3 times for the same concentration of Vivotrax+. Overall quantification yielded measurements that were within +/- 20% from ground truth, however SPION quantification values obtained at each laboratory were significantly different. Results suggest that the use of different imagers had a stronger influence on SPION quantification compared to differences arising from user error. Lastly, calibration conducted from samples in the imaging field of view gave the same quantification results as separately imaged samples. Conclusions: This study highlights that there are many factors that contribute to the accuracy and reproducibility of MPI quantification, including variation between MPI imagers and users, despite pre-defined experimental set up, image acquisition parameters, and ROI selection analysis.
Epithelial cells lining a gland and cells grown in a soft extracellular matrix polarize with apical proteins exposed to the lumen and basal proteins in contact with the extracellular matrix. Alterations to polarity, including an apical-out polarity, occur in human cancers. While some aberrant polarity states may result from altered protein trafficking, recent observations of an extraordinary tissue-level inside-out unfolding suggest an alternate pathway for altered polarity. Because mechanical alterations are common in human cancer including an upregulation of RhoA mediated actomyosin tension in acinar epithelia, we explored whether perturbing mechanical homeostasis could cause apical-out eversion. Acinar eversion was robustly induced by direct activation of RhoA or indirect activation of RhoA through blockage of β1 integrins, disruption of the LINC complex, oncogenic Ras activation, or Rac1 inhibition. Furthermore, laser ablation of a portion of the untreated acinus was sufficient to induce eversion. Analyses of acini revealed high curvature and low phosphorylated myosin in the apical cell surfaces relative to the basal surfaces. A vertex-based mathematical model which balances tension at cell-cell interfaces revealed a five-fold greater basal cell surface tension relative to the apical cell surface tension. The model suggests that the difference in surface energy between the apical and basal surfaces is the driving force for acinar eversion. Our findings raise the possibility that a loss of mechanical homeostasis may cause apical-out polarity states in human cancers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.