The objective of this study was to compare heifer growth and reproductive performance following 2 levels of stockpiled fall forage allowance of orchardgrass (30.5%) and tall fescue (14.1%). Spring-born heifers (n = 203 and BW = 246 ± 28.9 kg) of primarily Angus background were allocated to 2 grazing treatments during the fall period (November 12 to December 17 in yr 1, November 7 to January 4 in yr 2, and November 7 to January 14 in yr 3) each replicated 3 times per year for 3 yr. Treatments consisted of daily pasture DM allowance of 3.5% of BW (LO) or daily pasture DM allowance of 7.0% of BW (HI) under strip-grazing management. Throughout the winter feeding period, mixed grass-legume haylage and soybean hulls were fed. Heifers were grazed as 1 group under continuous stocking after the winter period. Heifers in the LO group gained less than heifers in the HI group during the fall grazing period (0.12 vs. 0.40 kg/d; P < 0.0001). For each 1 10 g increase in NDF/kg fall pasture (DM basis), fall ADG decreased 0.14 kg (P = 0.01). During winter feeding, ADG was 0.30 and 0.39 kg/d for LO vs. HI heifers, respectively (P = 0.0008). During the spring grazing period (April 16 to May 24 in yr 1, April 22 to May 26 in yr 2, and April 5 to May 16 in yr 3), LO heifers had numerically greater ADG than HI heifers (1.38 vs. 1.30 kg/d; P = 0.64). Hip height (122.7 vs. 121.4 cm; P = 0.0055), BCS (5.8 vs. 5.6; P = 0.0057), and BW (356 vs. 335 kg; P < 0.0001) at the end of spring grazing was greater for HI than LO heifers. Heifers in the LO group compensated with greater summer ADG than heifers in the HI group (0.74 vs. 0.66 kg/d; P = 0.03). Total ADG from treatment initiation (November) through pregnancy diagnosis (August) was greater for HI than LO heifers (0.61 vs. 0.55 kg/d; P < 0.001) as was BW at pregnancy diagnosis (415 vs. 402 kg; P = 0.0055). Percentage of heifers reaching puberty by the time of AI was 34% for both groups (P = 0.93). Percentage of heifers becoming pregnant to AI tended (P = 0.13) to be greater for HI (44%) than for LO heifers (32%). Fall ADG across treatment groups affected the probability of a heifer becoming pregnant by AI (P = 0.01). Percentage pregnant by natural service (61% for LO vs. 59% for HI; P = 0.80) and final pregnancy rate (74% for LO vs. 77% for HI; P = 0.61) was not different for the 2 groups. These results indicate that altering fall forage allowance may delay the majority of BW gain until late in heifer development without negatively affecting overall pregnancy rates.

The potential of tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus Dumort) and orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) as stockpiled forages has been documented; however, limited information describes the characteristics of other species, especially complex mixtures of cool-season naturalized pastures. A 3-yr study assessed the herbage mass, forage quality, and botanical composition of mixed cool-season naturalized pastures [orchardgrass, tall fescue, clover (Trifolium spp.), narrowleaf plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.), and quackgrass (Elymus repens [L.] Gould)] in response to two stocking rates based on daily herbage allowances of 3.5% (low) or 7.0% (high) of heifer bodyweight. The stocking rate for the entire pasture area, including unoccupied paddocks during the grazing period, was 2.4 and 1.3 heifers acre −1 for the low and high treatments, respectively. Stockpiling began in August; grazing began in early November. The initial herbage mass and botanical composition were determined at the end of the stockpiling period. Herbage samples were taken throughout the fall grazing period at intervals of 11 to 19 d. The stocking rate had no effect on changes in botanical composition. Total legume percentage increased from 6% in Year 1 to 31% in Year 3 (P < .05). Herbage mass declined more quickly in Year 3 than in Years 1 and 2 (P < .05), probably because of the high percentage of legumes. As fall grazing progressed, crude protein content and in vitro true dry matter digestibility declined, and neutral detergent fiber content increased. Mixed cool-season naturalized pastures could be used for stockpiling and grazed intensively without detrimental effects on subsequent stockpiling periods.

Beef heifer growth and reproductive performance responses following two levels of fall stockpiled forage allocation