The study tried to analyze the relationship of the numerical value of the faculty performance rating and the actual observations, opinions, feelings, and description of the students towards the performance of the observed faculty members using text analytics. The result reveals that students describe faculty members with a rating of 1 with negative words. Faculty members with rating 2 were described by the students using neutral words/word patterns. In the case of faculty members with rating 3, positive word/word pattern “good” was used by the students to describe the performance of the faculty members. The results revealed that if a faculty members was evaluated and rated 4 and 5 the descriptions are positive observations / comments from the student respondents. The results reveal not only the quantitative values of faculty evaluation it also exposed the qualitative description of the students in the performance of their faculty members. This study brings out significant aspects of the teaching performance of the faculty members of Pangasinan State University. The results can be used for coaching and mentoring by university and campus heads to their faculty members in terms of their weaknesses. Moreover, the results can be utilized by Pangasinan State University to evaluate the teaching performance of their faculty members based on the comments or opinions of the students.

Evaluating faculty members' performance is a very complex area to study. In addition, predicting the performance of these faculty members is a very difficult and challenging task. However, the core of education is teaching and learning, and teaching-learning works to its fullest when there are effective teachers. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty members is done based on the student evaluation of faculty. This research aims to develop a model to predict the performance of the faculty members using associative rule based on the existing evaluation form used by PSU to evaluate faculty members. The model is designed to utilize the knowledge of text analytics rule capabilities that will provide great support for the decision-making of Pangasinan State University in the Philippines. The result reveals that the term good is still the top one terms occurred for all campuses followed by teaching. The results indicated that teacher/faculty members on all campuses are good teachers. Associating words reveal that "teaching good subject/topic," "explains simply" and other meaningful associated words can be utilized to evaluate the performance of the teacher. The results exposed not only the quantitative values of faculty evaluation it also exposed the qualitative opinion of the students in the performance of their faculty members. This study reveals important aspects of the faculty member's teaching performance in terms of words/association of words that will describe their teaching performance. The results can be utilized in coaching and mentoring faculty members to cope with their weaknesses. The proposed model can be utilized by Pangasinan State University to evaluate the faculty members in terms of their teaching performance by utilizing the comments/opinions of the students.