All major classes of protein chaperones, including DnaK (the Hsp70 eukaryotic equivalent) and GroEL (the Hsp60 eukaryotic equivalent) have been found in Escherichia coli. Molecular chaperones enhance the yields of correctly folded polypeptides by preventing aggregation and even by disaggregating certain protein aggregates. Previously, we identified the ClpX heat‐shock protein of E. coli because it enables the ClpP catalytic protease to degrade the bacteriophage lambda O replication protein. Here we report that ClpX alone possesses all the properties expected of a molecular chaperone protein. Specifically, it can protect the lambda O protein from heat‐induced aggregation, disaggregate preformed lambda O aggregates, and even promote efficient binding of lambda O to its DNA recognition sequence. A lambda O‐ClpX specific protein‐protein interaction can be detected either by a modified ELISA assay or through the stimulation of ClpX's weak ATPase activity by lambda O. Unlike the behaviour of the major DnaK and GroEL chaperones, ClpX requires the presence of ATP or its non‐hydrolysable analogue ATP‐gamma‐S for efficient interaction with other proteins including the protection of lambda O from aggregation. However, ClpX's ability to disaggregate lambda O aggregates requires hydrolysable ATP. We propose that the ClpX protein is a bona fide chaperone, whose biological role includes the maintenance of certain polypeptides in a form competent for proteolysis by the ClpP protease. Furthermore, our results suggest that the ClpX protein also performs typical chaperone protein functions independent of ClpP.

DnaJ is a molecular chaperone, which not only binds to its various protein substrates, but can also activate the DnaK cochaperone to bind to its various protein substrates as well. DnaJ is a modular protein, which contains a putative zinc finger motif of unknown function. Quantitation of the released Zn(II) ions, upon challenge with p-hydroxymercuriphenylsulfonic acid, and by atomic absorption showed that two Zn(II) ions interact with each monomer of DnaJ. Following the release of Zn(II) ions, the free cysteine residues probably form disulfide bridge(s), which contribute to overcoming the destabilizing effect of losing Zn(II). Supporting this view, infrared and circular dichroism studies show that the DnaJ secondary structure is largely unaffected by the release of Zn(II). Moreover, infrared spectra recorded at different temperatures, as well as scanning calorimetry, show that the Zn(II) ions help to stabilize DnaJ's tertiary structure. An internal 57-amino acid deletion of the cysteine-reach region did not noticeably affect the affinity of this mutant protein, DnaJDelta144-200, to bind DnaK nor its ability to stimulate DnaK's ATPase activity. However, the DnaJDelta144-200 was unable to induce DnaK to a conformation required for the stabilization of the DnaK-substrate complex. Additionally, the DnaJDelta144-200 mutant protein alone was unimpaired in its ability to interact with its final sigma32 transcription factor substrate, but exhibited reduced affinity toward its P1 RepA and lambdaP substrates. Finally, these in vitro results correlate well with the in vivo observed partial inhibition of bacteriophage lambda growth in a DnaJDelta144-200 mutant background.

The Clp ATPases were originally identified as a regulatory component of the bacterial ATP-dependent Clp serine proteases. Proteins homologous to the Escherichia coli Clp ATPases (ClpA, B, X or Y) have been identified in every organism examined so far. Recent data suggest that the Clp ATPases are not only specificity factors which help to 'present' various protein substrates to the ClpP or other catalytic proteases, but are also molecular chaperones which can function independently of ClpP. This review discusses the recent evidence that the Clp ATPases are indeed molecular chaperones capable of either repairing proteins damaged during stress conditions or activating the initiation proteins for Mu, lambda or P1 DNA replication. A mechanism is suggested to explain how the Clp ATPases 'decide' whether to repair or destroy their protein substrates.

Using two independent experimental approaches to monitor protein-protein interactions (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography) we describe a general mechanism by which DnaJ modulates the binding of the DnaK chaperone to various native protein substrates, e.g. lambda P, lambda O, delta 32, P1, RepA, as well as permanently denatured alpha-carboxymethylated lactalbumin. The presence of DnaJ promotes the DnaK for efficient DnaK-substrate complex formation. ATP hydrolysis is absolutely required for such DnaJ-dependent activation of DnaK for binding to both native and denatured protein substrates. Although ADP can stabilize such as an activated DnaK-protein complex, it cannot substitute for ATP in the activation reaction. In the presence of DnaJ and ATP, DnaK possesses the affinity to different substrates which correlates well with the affinity of DnaJ alone for these protein substrates. Only when the affinity of the DnaJ chaperone for its protein substrate is relatively high (e.g. delta 32, RepA) can a tertiary complex DnaK-substrate-DnaJ be detected. In the case that DnaJ binds weakly to its substrate (lambda P, alpha-carboxymethylated lactalbumin), DnaJ is only transiently associated with the DnaK-substrate complex, but the DnaK activation reaction still occurs, albeit less efficiently.

No abstract