Background: Electrocardiography (ECG) signs, typical or acute pulmonary embolism, and their changes can be used for the prediction of clinical and haemodynamic outcomes. Purpose: To study the predictive value of the resolution of admission ECG signs in higher risk pulmonary embolism patients for 30-day survival and for the decrease in right ventricular systolic pressure. Methods: We analysed the 12-lead ECGs at admission and daily for the first 5 days after hospitalisation in 110 intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a single tertiary centre. The predictive value of the resolution of four ECG signs were analysed for 30-day survival and for the changes in right ventricular systolic pressure during hospitalisation: S-wave in the first standard lead, right bundle branch block pattern, S-wave in the aVL lead and negative T-waves in precordial leads. Results: ECG recordings showed the existence of S-wave in the I lead in 71 (64.5%), S-wave in the aVL in 77 (70%), right bundle branch block pattern in 30 (27.3%) and negative T-waves in 66 (60%) patients. All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was 13.6%. Among the ECG signs, only the presence of right bundle branch block at admission was significantly associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age, gender and right ventricular systolic pressure at admission was 7.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–27.9; P=0.002). The resolution of three ECG signs during the first 5 days of hospitalisation, S-wave in the I lead (HR 26.4, 95% CI 3.1–226.6; P=0.003), S-wave in the aVL (HR 21.5, 95% CI 2.6–175.3; P=0.004) and right bundle branch block configuration (HR 5.2, 95% CI 1.3–20.8; P=0.020) were associated with 30-day survival. The intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism patients with S-wave resolution in lead aVL had 0.0% and 7.1% 30-day all-cause mortality, respectively. The patients with resolution of the S-wave in the first lead and in aVL as well as right bundle branch block had more pronounced changes in right ventricular systolic pressure at discharge (27±13 vs. 13±15 mmHg; P=0.011 for S-wave in I lead resolution, 27±12 vs. 15±17 mmHg; P=0.004 for S-wave in aVL resolution and 23±14 vs. 9±14 mmHg; P=0.040 for right bundle branch block resolution) than patients without resolution. Conclusion: Resolution of S-waves and right bundle branch block in ECG correlates with lower all-cause 30-day mortality in intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism patients. Resolution of S-waves in the first lead and in aVL and right bundle branch block correlates with a decrease of right ventricular systolic pressure.

Aims This study aimed to investigate whether the risk of short-term mortality is different in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) as compared with those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results Predictive value of HFrEF or HFpEF for 7-day (intrahospital) and 30-day all-cause mortality was determined in the cohort of 1055 out of 1201 consecutive acute PE patients from the Serbian multicentre PE registry. Patients were classified into either HFrEF or HFpEF group, according to guideline-proposed criteria. A 7-day (intrahospital) and 30-day all-cause mortality was 18.5% vs. 7.3% vs. 4.5% (P < 0.001) and 22.2% vs. 16.3% vs. 7.9% (P < 0.001) for patients with the history of HFrEF, HFpEF, and without HF, respectively. Multivariable analysis adjusted to age, gender, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, presence of atrial fibrillation, and mortality risk assessment at admission has shown that only HFrEF, but not HFpEF, was an independent predictor for 7-day mortality (hazard ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.25-4,38.41, P = 0.021) and neither HFrEF or HFpEF was an independent predictor for 30-day mortality. Among various admission parameters associated to PE outcome, only systolic pressure in HFrEF patients (P < 0.001), heart rate (P = 0.01), and right ventricle systolic pressure (P = 0.039) in HFpEF patients were significantly different in patients who died compared with those who survived at 7 days. Conclusions Our study has shown that the presence of previous history of HFrEF, but not HFpEF, in acute PE is an independent risk factor for mortality at 7 days.

Background Combining vedolizumab with a rapid-onset drug such as cyclosporine is a novel combination treatment for severe steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis (UC). This prospective study describes the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in conjunction with vedolizumab in patients with severe, steroid-resistant UC with 1 year of follow-up. Methods Seventeen steroid-resistant UC patients were treated with cyclosporine in combination with vedolizumab, with a follow up of 52 weeks. Clinical and endoscopic response, remission rates, and colectomy-free survival were the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included biochemical response and remission with C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fecal calprotectin. Results Fifteen (88%) of 17 patients initially responded to cyclosporine and were started on vedolizumab. By week 10, 11 (73%) of 15 patients had achieved endoscopic remission with a Mayo score of ≤1. At week 26, 14 (93%) of 15 of the patients were in clinical remission and 11 (73%) were in endoscopic remission. At week 52 of follow-up, 10 (71%) of 14 of these patients continued to be in endoscopic remission and 11 (79%) of 14 were in clinical remission. Among the 10 patients in endoscopic remission, 8 (80%) reached histological remission. Colectomy-free survival rate was 82% (n = 14 of 17) at 1 year and mean C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fecal calprotectin levels were 3.2 mg/L, 16.1 mm/h, and 168.3 µg/g, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions Bridging cyclosporine to vedolizumab in severe, steroid-refractory UC patients is effective and safe at inducing and maintaining clinical, endoscopic, and biochemical response and remission up to 52 weeks of follow-up. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

No abstract

No abstract