PurposePercutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy of PEN has been relatively well investigated; however, the relationship between the clinical effectiveness of PEN and the severity of spinal canal stenosis by disc material has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of PEN according to the dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease.Materials and MethodsThis study included 363 patients with back pain from single level disc disease with and without radiculopathy. Patients were categorized into groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material: Category 1, less or more than 50%; and Category 2, three subgroups with lesser than a third, between a third and two thirds, and more than two thirds. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain and Odom's criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment.ResultsThe demographic data showed no difference between groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material except age (older age correlated with more spinal canal compromise). The dural sac cross-sectional area did not correlate with the VAS scores for back and leg pain after PEN in single level disc disease in Groups 1 and 2. Odom's criteria after PEN were also not different according to dural sac cross-sectional area by disc material.ConclusionPEN is an effective procedure in treating single level lumbar disc herniation without affecting dural sac cross-sectional area.

Although lumbar discectomy is an effective treatment for lumbar disc herniation, complications exist, including postoperative disc height loss, facet joint degeneration, and recurrent disc herniation. To solve these problems, annular closure devices have been utilized in other countries, producing satisfactory results, but there has been no report of annular closure device use in our country. Here, we demonstrate the preliminary reports of Barricaid® insertion in 3 patients who underwent surgery for lumbar disc herniation.

Study Design:Case description.Objective:Acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli muscle is a rare clinical entity that causes severe neck pain. This entity is not well recognized due to its nonspecific presentation such as acute neck pain, neck stiffness, and odynophagia. The importance of this disease with a review of the literature is presented.Summary of background data:Acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli muscle is an inflammatory condition caused by deposition of calcium hydroxyapatite in the superior oblique tendon fibers of the longus colli muscle. It can be misdiagnosed as other life-threatening conditions including retropharyngeal abscess, resulting in unnecessary medical or surgical interventions.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data, radiological features, and laboratory reports of 8 patients who were diagnosed with acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli muscle and seen at our institution between April 2008 and March 2015 in this article. We describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli muscle.Results:There were 5 men and 3 women who ranged in age from 41 to 49 years (mean age: 44.5 years). The associated symptoms included neck pain, stiffness, odynophagia, and headache. The duration of symptoms varied from 2 days to 1 week. All patients showed calcific deposition inferior to the anterior arch of the atlas, and prevertebral effusion extending from C1 to C4. All patients were treated with NSAIDs and immobilization with a cervical brace, and most patients showed complete resolution of symptoms within 1 week.Conclusion:We report 8 cases of acute calcific tendinitis of the longus colli, and describe the symptoms and radiological findings in detail. Awareness of this rare, benign, and self-limiting disease entity with characteristic radiologic findings is essential for early diagnosis and to avoid unnecessary medical and surgical interventions.