This study documents an emerging profile of the faculty status of faculty developers as solicited, compiled, and interactively interpreted with faculty developer practitioners. It used integrated (mixed) methodology and participatory research strategies to gather data and it shares descriptive statistical information on the various positions held by faculty developer respondents; qualitatively analyzed impressions of the importance of faculty status to their credibility and effectiveness as faculty developers; and information regarding respondents' institutional contexts. Findings are further disaggregated across institutional contexts and sex to explore trends, differential perceptions, and other emergent issues as identified by participant researchers.

Hazardous" describes events and conditions that produce an undesired, involuntary, career-changing disruption of a developer's professional practice. While faculty development is an immensely valuable asset to an institution that knows how to make use of it, the unique nature of faculty development centers within varied academic institutions brings occupational hazards to those who direct or work in such centers. Our study synthesizes and identifies patterns among over thirty cases furnished by developers, primarily center directors, who experienced career disruptions. We conclude by offering evidence-based counsel on how to recognize the hazards and mitigate damage.

Bonnie B. Mullinix, TLT Group and Greenville Technical College "Hazardous" describes events and conditions that produce an undesired, involuntary, career-changing disruption of a developer's professional practice. While faculty development is an immensely valuable asset to an institution that knows how to make use of it, the unique nature of faculty development centers within varied academic institutions brings occupational hazards to those who direct or work in such centers. Our study synthesizes and identifies patterns among over thirty cases furnished by developers, primarily center directors, who experienced career disruptions. We conclude by offering evidence-based counsel on how to recognize the hazards and mitigate damage.

This chapter documents the effectiveness of a responsive, multilevel, web-based system for identifyillg and responding tofaculty interest and needs for training and development. A case-based description illustrates theadvantages of using a web-facilitated approach to schedule sessions according tofaculty interest and availability. From needs assessment survey, to session design and scheduling, to registration, communication, and monitoring of participation. to evaluation and feedback. this integrated system hasproven effective in engaging faculty. Data collected over twoyears ofprogram implementation isshared and implications for the design, facilitation, and evaluation of such approaches areconsidered.

Collecting and using information about faculty skills can serve as an organizational development activity to guide faculty evaluation and professional development policy and practice with the goal of leading to improved teaching and learning. This chapter presents findings from a study with international, local, quantitative, and qualitative components. Readers are encouraged to explore data patterns and consider courses of action that these imply, and to reflect on the potential usefulness of the Meta-Profession model for furthering reflection, dialogue, and action on development and evaluation processes on their own campus.