Recent upgrades to the U.S. radar network now allow for polarimetric measurements of landfalling hurricanes, providing a new data set to validate cloud microphysical parameterizations used in tropical cyclone simulations. Polarimetric radar reflectivity and differential reflectivity simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model were compared with real radar observations from 2014 in Hurricanes Arthur and Ana. Six different microphysics parameterizations were tested that were able to capture the major features of both hurricanes, including accurate tracks, precipitation asymmetry, and the approximate intensity of the storms. A high correlation between simulated intensity and rainfall across schemes suggests an intimate link between the latent heating produced by the microphysics and the storm dynamics. Most of the parameterizations produced a higher frequency of larger raindrops than observed. The Thompson aerosol‐aware bulk and explicit spectral bin microphysical schemes showed the best fidelity to the observations at a higher computational cost.
The internal variability and predictability of idealized three-dimensional hurricanes is investigated using 100-day-long, statistically steady simulations in a compressible, nonhydrostatic, cloud-resolving model. The equilibrium solution is free of the confounding effects of initial conditions and environmental variability in order to isolate the ''intrinsic'' characteristics of the hurricane.The variance of the axisymmetric tangential velocity is dominated by two patterns: one characterized by a radial shift of the maximum wind, and the other by intensity modulation at the radius of maximum wind. These patterns are associated with convectively coupled bands of anomalous wind speed that propagate inward from large radii with a period of roughly 5 days, the strongest of which is associated with an eyewall replacement cycle. The asymmetric tangential wind is strongest radially inward of the radius of maximum wind. On average, asymmetries decelerate the azimuthal-mean tangential wind at the radius of maximum wind and accelerate it along the inner edge of eyewall.Predictability of axisymmetric storm structure is measured through the autocorrelation e-folding time and linear inverse modeling. Results from both methods reveal an intrinsic predictability time scale of about 2 days. The predictability and variability of the axisymmetric storm structure are consistent with recently obtained results from idealized axisymmetric hurricane modeling.
Polarimetric upgrades to the U.S. radar network have allowed new insight into the precipitation processes of tropical cyclones. Previous work by the authors compared the reflectivity at horizontal polarization and differential reflectivity observations from two hurricanes to simulated radar observations from the WRF model, and found that the aerosol‐aware Thompson‐Eidhammer microphysical scheme performed the best of several commonly used bulk microphysical parameterizations. Here we expand our investigation of the Thompson‐Eidhammer scheme, and find that though it provided the most accurate forecast in terms of wind speed and simulated radar signatures, the scheme produces areas in which the differential reflectivity was much higher than observed. We conclude that the Thompson‐Eidhammer scheme produces drop size distributions that have a larger median drop size than observed in regions of light stratiform precipitation. Examination of the vertical structure of simulated differential reflectivity indicates that the source of the discrepancy between the model and radar observations likely originates within the melting layer. The treatment of number production of rain drops from melting snow in the microphysical scheme is shown to be the ultimate source of the enhancement of differential reflectivity. A modification to the scheme is shown to result in better fidelity of the radar variables with the observations without degrading the short‐term intensity forecast. Additional tests with an idealized squall line simulation are consistent with the hurricane results, suggesting the modification is generally applicable. The modifications to the Thompson‐Eidhammer scheme shown here have been incorporated into updates of the WRF model starting with version 3.8.1.
Potential intensity theory predicts that the upper-tropospheric temperature acts as an important constraint on tropical cyclone (TC) intensity. The physical mechanisms through which the upper troposphere impacts TC intensity and structure have not been fully explored, however, due in part to limited observations and the complex interactions between clouds, radiation, and TC dynamics. In this study, idealized Weather Research and Forecasting Model ensembles initialized with a combination of three different tropopause temperatures and with no radiation, longwave radiation only, and full diurnal radiation are used to examine the physical mechanisms in the TC–upper-tropospheric temperature relationship on weather time scales. Simulated TC intensity and structure are strongly sensitive to colder tropopause temperatures using only longwave radiation, but are less sensitive using full radiation and no radiation. Colder tropopause temperatures result in deeper convection and increased ice mass aloft in all cases, but are more intense only when radiation was included. Deeper convection leads to increased local longwave cooling rates but reduced top-of-the-atmosphere outgoing longwave radiation, such that the total radiative heat sink is reduced from a Carnot engine perspective in stronger storms. We hypothesize that a balanced response in the secondary circulation described by the Eliassen equation arises from upper-troposphere radiative cooling anomalies that lead to stronger tangential winds. The results of this study further suggest that radiation and cloud–radiative feedbacks have important impacts on weather time scales.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.