No abstract

No abstract

Aims Cardiac CT is increasingly applied for planning and follow-up of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, there are no data available on reverse remodelling after TAVI assessed by CT. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the predictors and the prognostic value of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling following TAVI using CT angiography. Methods and results We investigated 117 patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent CT scanning before and after TAVI procedure with a mean follow-up time of 2.6 years after TAVI. We found a significant reduction in LV mass (LVM) and LVM indexed to body surface area comparing pre- vs. post-TAVI images: 180.5 ± 53.0 vs. 137.1 ± 44.8 g and 99.7 ± 25.4 vs. 75.4 ± 19.9 g/m2, respectively, both P < 0.001. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) was detected in 25.6% (30/117) patients. More than 20% reduction in LVM was defined as reverse remodelling and was detected in 62.4% (73/117) of the patients. SLT, change in mean pressure gradient on echocardiography and prior myocardial infarction was independently associated with LV reverse remodelling after adjusting for age, gender, and traditional risk factors (hypertension, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidaemia): OR = 0.27, P = 0.022 for SLT and OR = 0.22, P = 0.006 for prior myocardial infarction, OR = 1.51, P = 0.004 for 10 mmHg change in mean pressure gradient. Reverse remodelling was independently associated with favourable outcomes (HR = 0.23; P = 0.019). Conclusion TAVI resulted in a significant LVM regression on CT. The presence of SLT showed an inverse association with LV reverse remodelling and thus it may hinder the beneficial LV structural changes. Reverse remodelling was associated with improved long-term prognosis.

Aims We wished to assess whether different clinical definitions of coronary artery disease (CAD) [segment stenosis and involvement score (SSS, SIS), Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS)] affect which patients are considered to progress and which risk factors affect progression. Methods and results We enrolled 115 subsequent patients (60.1 ± 9.6 years, 27% female) who underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging with &gt;1year between the two examinations. CAD was described using SSS, SIS, and CAD-RADS. Linear mixed models were used to investigate the effects of risk factors on the overall amount of CAD and the effect on annual progression rate of different definitions. Coronary plaque burdens were SSS 4.63 ± 4.06 vs. 5.67 ± 5.10, P &lt; 0.001; SIS 3.43 ± 2.53 vs. 3.89 ± 2.65, P &lt; 0.001; CAD-RADS 0:8.7% vs. 0.0% 1:44.3% vs. 40.9%, 2:34.8% vs. 40.9%, 3:7.0% vs. 9.6% 4:3.5% vs. 6.1% 5:1.7% vs. 2.6%, P &lt; 0.001, at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Overall, 53.0%, 29.6%, and 28.7% of patients progressed over time based on SSS, SIS, and CAD-RADS, respectively. Of the patients who progressed based on SSS, only 54% showed changes in CAD-RADS. Smoking and diabetes increased the annual progression rate of SSS by 0.37/year and 0.38/year, respectively (both P &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, each year increase in age raised SSS by 0.12 [confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.20, P = 0.001] and SIS 0.10 (CI 0.06–0.15, P &lt; 0.001), while female sex was associated with 2.86 lower SSS (CI −4.52 to −1.20, P &lt; 0.001) and 1.68 SIS values (CI −2.65 to −0.77, P = 0.001). Conclusion CAD-RADS could not capture the progression of CAD in almost half of patients with serial CTA. Differences in CAD definitions may lead to significant differences in patients who are considered to progress, and which risk factors are considered to influence progression.

Background The prospective, multicentre EURECA registry assessed the use of imaging and adoption of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines (GL) in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Methods Between May 2019 and March 2020, 5156 patients were recruited in 73 centres from 24 ESC member countries. The adoption of GL recommendations was evaluated according to clinical presentation and pre-test probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Results The mean age of the population was 64 ± 11 years, 60% of patients were males, 42% had PTP &gt;15%, 27% had previous CAD, and ejection fraction was &lt;50% in 5%. Exercise ECG was performed in 32% of patients, stress imaging as the first choice in 40%, and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in 22%. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was the first or downstream test in 17% and 11%, respectively. Obstructive CAD was documented in 24% of patients, inducible ischaemia in 19%, and 13% of patients underwent revascularization. In 44% of patients, the overall diagnostic process did not adopt the GL. In these patients, referral to stress imaging (21% vs. 58%; P &lt; 0.001) or CTCA (17% vs. 30%; P &lt; 0.001) was less frequent, while exercise ECG (43% vs. 22%; P &lt; 0.001) and ICA (48% vs. 15%; P &lt; 0.001) were more frequently performed. The adoption of GL was associated with fewer ICA, higher proportion of diagnosis of obstructive CAD (60% vs. 39%, P &lt; 0.001) and revascularization (54% vs. 37%, P &lt; 0.001), higher quality of life, fewer additional testing, and longer times to late revascularization. Conclusions In patients with CCS, current clinical practice does not adopt GL recommendations on the use of diagnostic tests in a significant proportion of patients. When the diagnostic approach adopts GL recommendations, invasive procedures are less frequently used and the diagnostic yield and therapeutic utility are superior.