Objective: To evaluate traditional and non-traditional risk factors for subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A prospective cohort of 78 patients with SLE without overt atherosclerotic disease was studied. SLE clinical and laboratory parameters, disease activity and damage, treatment and traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis were evaluated. At baseline (T1) and after five years' follow up (T2), the serum levels of anti-oxidised palmitoyl arachidonoyl phosphocholine (oxPAPC), anti-heat shock protein 65, and anti-b 2 -glycoprotein I antibodies and C reactive protein were tested. At T2, intima-media thickness (IMT) was measured using duplex carotid sonography. Thickened intima, plaque, mean IMT (m-IMT), and maximum IMT (M-IMT) were assessed. Results: A thickened intima was seen in 22/78 (28%) patients and plaque in 13/78 (17%). M-IMT and m-IMT were (mean (SD)) 0.77 (0.34) mm and 0.55 (0.15) mm, respectively. Patients with carotid abnormalities were significantly older, had higher blood pressure and total serum cholesterol levels, and had taken a higher prednisone cumulative dosage than those without any lesions. The carotid abnormalities were associated with renal disease and ECLAM .2 at T1, and with azathioprine treatment. In multivariate analysis, age and cumulative prednisone dose were associated with carotid abnormalities; age, hypertension, and anti-oxPAPC at T2 were correlated with higher M-IMT and m-IMT. Conclusions: In patients with SLE some non-traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis were identified, the most important of which was the cumulative prednisone dose. The role of some traditional risk factors, such as age and hypertension, was also confirmed. The predictive value of the new immunological and inflammatory markers of atherosclerosis seems to be masked by some disease related features.
Background-Immunization with  2 -glycoprotein I (2GPI), the probable target of autoimmune anticardiolipin antibodies, results in experimental antiphospholipid syndrome in different mouse strains. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of 2GPI immunization on the progression of atherosclerosis. Methods and Results-In the first experiment, 3 groups of LDL receptor-deficient (LDL-RD) mice (nϭ15 per group) were immunized with either 2GPI or ovalbumin or were not immunized and were fed a chow diet for 12 weeks. In a second experiment, 3 groups of LDL-RD mice (nϭ10 per group) were immunized similarly and fed an atherogenic diet for 6 weeks. All 2GPI-immunized mice developed high titers of anti-2GPI antibodies as well as a specific lymph node proliferation to 2GPI. The average cholesterol levels did not differ between the mice fed similar diets, regardless of the immunization protocol. Atherosclerosis was enhanced in the 2GPI-immunized mice (mean aortic lesion, 26 000Ϯ5700 m 2 ) in comparison with their ovalbumin-immunized (mean, 3000Ϯ1099 m 2 ; PϽ0.01) and nonimmunized (mean, 2250Ϯ700 m 2 ; PϽ0.01) littermates. The average lesion size in the 2GPI-immunized mice fed an atherogenic diet (mean, 98 000Ϯ8305 m 2 ) was larger than the ovalbumin-immunized mice (mean, 81 250Ϯ12 933 m 2 ; PϭNS) or the nonimmunized controls (mean, 75 625Ϯ7281 m 2 ; PϭNS). The atherosclerotic plaques in the 2GPI-immunized mice appeared to be more mature, and denser infiltration of CD4 lymphocytes was present in the subendothelium of the aortic sinuses from this group of mice. Conclusions-The results of the present study provide the first direct evidence for the proatherogenic effect of 2GPI immunization and establish a new model for immune-mediated atherosclerosis. (Circulation. 1998;98:1108-1115.)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.