CDT scored according to a comprehensive technique may be of value in differentiating DAT from VD patients. We hypothesize that the classificatory ability of Freedman's method might be attributed to its presumed sensitivity to impaired executive functioning which is more pronounced in VD compared with DAT patients.

Background and purpose The CAMCOG is the second most popular cognitive testing instrument in use by Israeli clinicians. The present study examines the reliability and validity of a Hebrew version of the CAMCOG in a group of dementia sufferers in a clinical setting. Method Study participants included 36 dementia sufferers and 19 control non‐demented, depressed elderly subjects, consecutive referrals to an outpatient psychogeriatric service and an ‘open’ ward of a psychiatric hospital. Operational clinical criteria for dementia and its subtypes and for the various forms of depression were used as the ‘gold’ standards. The CAMCOG was translated into Hebrew and then back to English. Seven items needed modifications for local usage. Results Interrater and test–retest scores calculated as exact agreement rates ranged from good to excellent for all items, although test–retest reliability scores were generally lower than interrater scores. Kappa statistics ranged from good to excellent for all but one item in the interrater scores and for two items in the test–retest scores. A strong convergent validity was found with the MMSE score (r=0.89, p<0.01). The 79/80 cutoff point provided moderate sensitivity (57.9%), excellent specificity (97.2%) and a strong predictive value (83.6%). Conclusion The Hebrew version of the CAMCOG was found to be an appropriate instrument to discriminate between demented and non‐demented depressed controls in a clinical setting. In light of the demographic, cultural and linguistic heterogeneity of the Israeli elderly population, further studies should examine the psychometric characteristics of the CAMCOG in a more varied sample and also using other cutoff points in order to establish if an increase in its discriminatory power is obtainable. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The authors developed a scoring system for clock drawing, based on modification and integration of 3 established scoring methods. The Clock Drawing Test-Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA) is a 4-step, 20-item instrument, with a maximum score of 33, which emphasizes differential scoring of contour, numbers, hands, and center. It was administered to 139 patients (93 with and 46 without dementia). Dementia patients revealed significantly more impairment on the CDT-MIA total score and hours and hands subscores. Correlations between CDT-MIA and 2 CDTs were high. With receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, the area constructed under CDT-MIA curve was large. The best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for CDT-MIA was the cut-point 23 (91% and 80%, respectively). The internal consistency of CDT-MIA was high, and there was a high degree of interrater reliability. Thus, CDT-MIA was found to be a valid and reliable evaluation instrument for dementia patients in a specialized setting.