No abstract

No abstract

Background Recent work has shed light on the potential benefits of cannabinoids for multimodal pain control following orthopedic procedures. The objective of this review was to summarize the available evidence of analgesic and opioid-sparing effects cannabinoids have in orthopedic surgery and identify adverse events associated with their use. Methods A systematic review of the literature using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar was performed to include all primary, therapeutic studies published on the use of cannabis, and cannabis-derived products in orthopedic surgery. Results The literature review returned 4292 citations. Thirteen publications were found to meet inclusion criteria. Four randomized controlled trials were evaluated while the remaining studies were of quasi-experimental design. Conclusion Research on cannabinoids in orthopedic surgery is mostly of a quasi-experimental nature and is mainly derived from studies where orthopedics was not the primary focus. The overall results demonstrate potential usefulness of cannabinoids as adjunctive analgesics and in mitigating opioid use. However, the current evidence is far from convincing. There is a need to produce rigorous evidence with well-designed randomized controlled trials specific to orthopedic surgery to further establish these effects.

Background: The utilization of the S2 Alar-Iliac (S2AI) screw provides an optimal method of spinopelvic fixation. The free-hand placement of these screws obviates the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy and relies heavily on sacropelvic anatomy; variations of this anatomy could alter the ideal screw trajectory. The S2AI corridor is near several neurovascular structures, thus an accurate trajectory is critical. The reported angles of trajectory vary within the literature and a paucity of data exists on how patient morphometry influences ideal screw trajectory. We sought to examine the relationship between ideal screw trajectory and pelvic parameters. Methods: The records of 99 consecutive patients with degenerative thoracolumbar pathology were reviewed and pelvic parameters including sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence were measured with preoperative standing radiographs. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstructions, an ideal S2AI trajectory was defined and anteroposterior (horizontal) and cephalocaudal (sagittal) angles were recorded. Results: Pelvic tilt was found to have a moderate inverse correlation with cephalocaudal screw trajectory (r =-0.467, p-value = 0.006). Pelvic incidence and sacral slope had weaker correlations with cephalocaudal screw angle. In subgroup analysis, patients with high pelvic tilt (> 20°) had a significantly lower cephalocaudal screw trajectory (24.9 ± 3.7°versus 29.8 ± 2.8°, p-value = < 0.001) compared to those with a normal pelvic tilt (≤ 20°). Conclusions: This study found an inverse relationship between pelvic tilt and cephalocaudal S2AI screw trajectory. Therefore, the sagittal angle of insertion becomes increasingly more perpendicular to the floor (less caudally orientated) as pelvic tilt increases in reference to a patient positioned prone on an operating table parallel to the floor. This may bolster safety and efficacy when utilizing the free-hand technique for placement of the S2AI screw as it allows the surgeon to plan a more ideal trajectory by accounting for pelvic parameters.