No abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries in which the nerve is not completely severed often result in neuromas‐in‐continuity. These can cause sensory and functional deficits and must be resected and reconstructed. In defects greater than 5 mm in length, nerve graft is indicated, and suture neurorrhaphy is typically used to secure the nerve ends. However, sutures may negatively impact nerve regeneration. Fibrin glue has recently been used to mitigate the inflammatory response associated with suture neurorrhaphy. Most of the literature regarding fibrin glue covers animal models and supports its use for nerve reconstruction. Tisseel, a fibrin sealant developed as an adjunct to hemostasis, has recently shown utility in peripheral nerve repair by increasing tensile strength without additional sutures. We present the successful use of Tisseel sealant in a neuroma resection and reconstruction. In this case, a 35‐year‐old female presented with persistent neuropathic pain and neurologic dysfunction related to the median nerve in her hand with a history of distal forearm laceration and prior carpal tunnel release. Upon exploration, a neuroma‐in‐continuity involving 75% of the nerve was identified, resected, and reconstructed using processed human nerve allograft, as well as Tisseel sealant and Axoguard nerve protector to secure the repair and offload tension. At 1‐year follow‐up, pain was resolved, with ≤8 mm static 2‐point discrimination in the median nerve distribution, and excellent improvement in hand strength compared with preoperative conditions. The outcome of this case indicates that fibrin glue may be useful to avoid excess sutures in cases of neuroma‐in‐continuity not involving the entire cross‐section of the nerve.

Background: Treatment of patients with traumatic axonotmesis presents challenges. Processed human umbilical cord membrane has been recently developed with improved handling and resorption time compared to other amniotic membrane wraps, and may be beneficial in nerve reconstruction. This study evaluates postoperative outcomes after traumatic peripheral nerve injury after placement of commercially available processed human umbilical cord membrane. Methods: We performed a prospective, single-center pilot study of patients undergoing multi-level surgical reconstruction for exposed, non-transected peripheral nerve. Functional outcomes including pain, range of motion, pinch and grip strength, and the QuickDASH and SF-36 patient-reported outcome measures were recorded, when possible, at the 1-week and 3, 6, and 9 months postop visit. One-tailed paired t-tests were performed to evaluate outcome improvement at final follow-up. Results: Twenty patients had processed human umbilical cord membrane placement without surgical complications. Mean follow-up was 7.5 months (range: 3–10 months) and mean age was 39 years (range: 15–65). Twelve (67%) patients were male, and the majority of placement sites were in the upper extremity (85%). Mean preoperative visual analog scale pain score was significantly reduced at most recent follow-up, as were QuickDASH scores. All patients had improved functional outcomes at the 9-month follow-up, and SF-36 outcomes at 9 months showed improvement across all dimensions. Conclusion: This study indicates that processed human umbilical cord membrane may be a useful adjunct in nerve surgery with noted improvements in postoperative function, pain, and patient-reported outcome measures. Future studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes after traumatic nerve injury treated with processed human umbilical cord membrane.

Background: Distal digital nerve repairs can present unique challenges for hand surgeons due to their sensitive location and ongoing difficulty obtaining soft tissue coverage in this region. Although autografts and nerve conduits have been shown to be of benefit with nerve gaps, they can have morbidities associated with their use. Nerve allografts have become a viable option over the past decade as their use has increased and data are now showing similar outcomes, particularly in short gap segments. Flaps and skin grafts are traditional coverage options for full thickness wounds but can pose challenges with multiple digit involvement, depth of wound, and critical structures exposed. Methods: We present a case where nerve allograft was used for distal digital nerve repair. Due to the distal nature of the nerve repair in the index digit distal to the trifurcation, the distal end of the nerve graft was connected to multiple small nerve ends. Dermal substitute was placed to achieve distal coverage of the affected digits. Results: At 6-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated improved strength, normal sensation, and full return of digital function. Conclusion: Nerve allograft can be used in combination with dermal skin substitute to achieve normal sensation and return of digital function following distal digital nerve injuries.