Introduction and Objectives: Surface depressions and skin laxity together play a role in the appearance of cellulite. Cellulite depressions can be improved through disruption of the subcutaneous fibrous structures. Some currently utilized approaches accomplish this through invasive techniques requiring local anesthesia and potential down time. Skin laxity can exacerbate the appearance of cellulite, however current invasive approaches do little to improve skin laxity. The objective of this study was to evaluate a noninvasive approach to improving both cellulite depressions and skin laxity through the use of rapid acoustic pulses (acoustic subcision). Safety, efficacy, tolerability, and participant satisfaction results were measured. Methods: Women (n = 56) with moderate to severe cellulite were treated in a single acoustic subcision treatment session without anesthesia. Posttreatment adverse events (AEs) and tolerability were recorded. At 12-weeks cellulite outcomes were assessed using a 6-point simplified Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and a participant satisfaction questionnaire. Additionally, laxity improvement was measured using a 4-point Laxity Score (LS) and GAIS. Results: Improvement in cellulite appearance measured at 12-weeks showed that participants (n = 56) had a mean CSS reduction of 1.01 (a 29.5% reduction from baseline). The posttreatment photograph was correctly identified by blinded independent reviewers from randomized pairs of pre/posttreatment photographs for 96.4% of participants. Cellulite was graded as improved, much improved or very much improved using the GAIS at 90.9% of treated locations. Finally, 92.9% of participants reported positive satisfaction responses. Scoring for improvement in skin laxity appearance at 12-weeks showed a mean LS reduction of 0.57 (a 27.9% reduction from baseline). GAIS for laxity was graded as improved, much improved or very much improved in 67.3% of treated areas. No unexpected or serious AEs were noted at treatment or follow-up. Overall average pain score during treatment was 2.4 (0-10 pain scale) and 0.3 immediately posttreatment. Conclusion: A single noninvasive acoustic subcision session can safely provide meaningful improvement in the appearance of cellulite in terms of depressions, as well as skin laxity, with minimal treatment pain and no posttreatment down time. Further improvement in appearance is expected with multiple treatments over time. Additional trials to verify this are planned.

Introduction and Objectives Fibrosis, including hypertrophic scar formation, is a pathological condition characterized by excessive production and accumulation of collagen, and loss of tissue architecture, in response to wound healing. Alterations in the extracellular matrix (ECM) biomechanical properties may be important in modulating myofibroblasts and fibrosis formation. The acoustic subcision device uses rapid acoustic pulse technology to noninvasively improve the appearance of hypertrophic scars through both microdisruption of scar tissue matrix and downregulation of fibrotic fibroblasts leading to scar remodeling. The objective of this single‐site proof‐of‐concept IRB‐approved human clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of acoustic subcision device for the improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars. Method Eleven hypertrophic scars in 10 participants were treated with a single 6‐minute acoustic subcision application without anesthesia. Posttreatment adverse events (AEs) and tolerability were recorded. At 12 and 89 weeks posttreatment, scar heights and volumes were measured, and participant satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Finally, at the last visit the scar appearance was assessed by the Principal Investigator (PI) using the Mecott Modified Scar Scale (MMSS). Results Immediately following the acoustic subcision treatment, only mild, moderate erythema or pinpoint bleeding were noted. The treatment sessions were considered tolerable by all participants with an average pain score of 2.2 (on a 0–10 pain score with 10 being the worse possible pain). The 12‐ and 89‐week assessments demonstrated mean height reductions of 46.3% and 56.8%, respectively from baseline. The differences in scar height were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The 12‐ and 89‐week assessments demonstrated a mean volume reduction of 63.2% and 58.1% respectively from baseline. The differences in the scar volume were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The PI graded an average improvement of 33.7% in scar appearance using the MMSS, a statistically significant change (p < 0.001). Finally, >90% of participants reported satisfaction with the improvement in their scar. Conclusion This proof‐of‐concept study showed that a single noninvasive acoustic subcision treatment session can safely provide statistically significant improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars with minimal treatment pain and meaningful participant satisfaction. More work is needed on a larger number of scars to verify this finding. Further improvement in appearance is expected with multiple acoustic subcision treatments and/or treatments in combination with currently available options. Additional trials to verify this are planned.

No abstract

Fractionated ablative lasers reliably result in improvement in photoaging. Despite marketing claims, no statistically significant differences were found in outcomes, pain during treatment, or histologic findings. Even with experienced users, significant adverse reactions are possible.

BACKGROUNDCellulite is a well-known concern for many women; however, treatment can prove challenging because of the complexities of cellulite etiology, the various factors contributing to its appearance, and the multitude of therapies and procedures available.OBJECTIVETo discuss current cellulite treatment options and effective clinical management.METHODSA roundtable meeting was convened to discuss and share views on current cellulite treatment options, new technologies, and clinical management. The participants' views helped guide a narrative review on this topic.RESULTSAdvanced interventions for cellulite treatment—such as physical and acoustic subcision, radiofrequency, and injectable biostimulators—are gradually being established, with accumulating evidence showing efficacy, patient satisfaction, and potentially long-lasting outcomes. Cellulite severity rating scales are necessary for assessing treatment outcomes, but these can be complex to use in clinical practice, and the majority do not include patient or clinician perspectives.CONCLUSIONWith the advent of new treatments and technologies, cosmetic surgeons and dermatologists will need to tailor their approach to each patient's needs and manage patient expectations because multimodal methods are likely to be required to address the various factors underlying cellulite appearance.