Balanced chromosome rearrangements are one of the main etiological factors contributing to hypoprolificacy in the domestic pig. Amongst domestic animals, the pig is considered to have the highest prevalence of chromosome rearrangements. To date over 200 unique chromosome rearrangements have been identified. The factors predisposing pigs to chromosome rearrangements, however, remain poorly understood. Nevertheless, here we provide empirical evidence which sustains the notion that there is a non-random distribution of chromosomal rearrangement breakpoints in the pig genome. We sought to establish if there are structural chromosome factors near which rearrangement breakpoints preferentially occur. The distribution of rearrangement breakpoints was analyzed across three level, chromosomes, chromosome arms, and cytogenetic GTG-bands (G-banding using trypsin and giemsa). The frequency of illegitimate exchanges (e.g., reciprocal translocations) between individual chromosomes and chromosome arms appeared to be independent of chromosome length and centromere position. Meanwhile chromosome breakpoints were overrepresented on some specific G-bands, defining chromosome hotspots for ectopic exchanges. Cytogenetic band level factors, such as the length of bands, chromatin density, and presence of fragile sites, were associated with the presence of translocation breakpoints. The characteristics of these bands were largely similar to that of hotspots in the human genome. Therefore, those hotspots are proposed as a starting point for future molecular analyses into the genomic landscape of porcine chromosome rearrangements.

Few sex-autosome chromosome abnormalities have been documented in domestic animal species. In humans, Y-autosome chromosome abnormalities may occur at a rate of 1/2,000 live births, whereas in the domestic pig only 2 Y-autosome reciprocal translocations have been previously described. During a routine cytogenetic screening of young boars, we identified a new Y-autosome translocation carrier, which after puberty showed semen devoid of sperm and testicular hypoplasia with spermatogenesis arrest. Whole chromosome painting by FISH analysis corroborated the reciprocal nature of the chromosomal exchanges between the Y chromosome and SSC13. The possible causes for the observed meiotic arrest of the carrier are reviewed.

Meiotic sex chromosome silencing (MSCS) has been argued as a prerequisite for normal meiotic cell division progression during the synaptic prophase I stage. Furthermore, irregular asynapsis of autosomal axes at meiosis may be encompassing the lack of transcriptional activity normally observed for the X and Y sex chromosomes. Therefore, any chromosomal rearrangement compromising the normal mechanism of MSCS and/or the contrary, the normal meiotic transcriptional activity of autosomal chromosomes, may be observed as a meiotic and concomitant spermatogenesis arrest. Previously, we have described a Y-autosome translocation t(Y;13)(p1.3;q3.3) in an azoospermic boar. Its chromosome synapsis behavior by synaptonemal complex immunostaining and FISH analyses is documented here. Histone γH2AX protein foci appeared to be located at unsynapsed chromosomal segments (e.g., X chromosome univalents or unpaired multivalent segments), although interestingly a high proportion of primary spermatocytes showed full paired synaptonemal complex-multivalent configurations which were devoid of a γH2AX focus signal, indicating meiotic chromosome silencing. RT-qPCR analysis of testicular expression showed downregulation of 3 SSC13 genes (MLH1, SOX2, UBE2B) and upregulation of SSCY genes (ZFY, SRY). The irregularity of the normal transcription pattern in case of these genes with proven roles in the testis is in agreement with the cytological observations and could contribute to the observed phenotype.

The chromosomes of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) are known to be prone to reciprocal chromosome translocations and other balanced chromosome rearrangements with concomitant fertility impairment of carriers. In response to the remarkable prevalence of chromosome rearrangements in swine herds, clinical cytogenetics laboratories have been established in several countries in order to screen young boars for chromosome rearrangements prior to service. At present, clinical cytogenetics laboratories typically apply classical cytogenetics techniques such as giemsa-trypsin (GTG)-banding to produce high-quality karyotypes and reveal large-scale chromosome ectopic exchanges. Further refinements to clinical cytogenetics practices have led to the implementation of molecular cytogenetics techniques such as fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), allowing for rearrangements to be visualized and breakpoints refined using fluorescently labelled painting probes. The next-generation of clinical cytogenetics include the implementation of DNA microarrays, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies such as DNA sequencing to better explore tentative genome architecture changes. The implementation of these cytogenomics techniques allow the genomes of rearrangement carriers to be deciphered at the highest resolution, allowing rearrangements to be detected; breakpoints to be delineated; and, most importantly, potential gene implications of those chromosome rearrangements to be interrogated. Clinical cytogenetics has become an integral tool in the livestock industry, identifying rearrangements and allowing breeders to make informed breeding decisions.

In the routine commercial karyotype analysis on 5,481 boars, we identified 32 carriers of mosaic reciprocal translocations, half of which were carrying a specific recurrent translocation, mos t(7;9). An additional 7 mosaic translocations were identified through lymphocyte karyotype analysis from parents and relatives of mosaic carriers (n = 45), a control group of non-carrier boars (n = 73), and a mitogen assessment study (n = 20), bringing the total number of mosaic carriers to 39 cases. Mosaic translocations in all carriers were recognized to be confined to hematopoietic cells as no translocations were identified in fibroblasts cells of the carriers. In addition, negative impact on reproduction was not observed as the fertility of the carriers and their relatives were comparable to breed averages, and cryptic mosaicism was not detected in the family tree. This paper presents the first study of mosaic reciprocal translocations identified in swine through routine screening practices on reproductively unproven breeding boars while presenting evidence that these type of chromosome abnormalities are not associated with any affected phenotype on the carrier animals. In addition, the detection of recurrent mosaic translocations in this study may emphasize the non-random nature of mosaic rearrangements in swine and the potential role of genomic elements in their formation. Chromosome translocations in a mosaic state are rarely reported in domestic animal species. To date, over 200 constitutional chromosome rearrangements have been reported in the domestic pig 1 , while only four mosaic abnormalities are previously documented for this species 2,3. The discrepancy in reports is mainly due to the fact that constitutional chromosome rearrangements are present in each individual cell, including germ cells, thus adversely affecting reproduction in otherwise phenotypically normal carriers 4-6. Therefore, the primary focus of cytogenetic screening programs in domestic animal species is the identification of constitutional chromosome abnormalities, and the removal of carrier animals from the breeding population 7. As such, cytogenetic screening programs are continually being performed on the domestic pig, which have allowed for accurate estimates of the prevalence and rate of formation for constitutional rearrangements in this species 6-8. Between 0.5-1.5% of reproductively unproven young boars are estimated to be carriers of constitutional chromosome rearrangements, with reciprocal chromosome translocations being the most prevalent chromosome structural abnormality reported so far 1,6-9. Typically, routine karyotype analysis, which differentiates normal from abnormal chromosome constitutions, is based on the careful analysis of at least two optimal Giemsa banded karyotypes (GTG-banded), predicated on constitutional chromosome abnormalities being present in any single somatic cells 10,11. As such, chromosome