Background The Latarjet procedure reduces recurrent glenohumeral instability but has potential hardware and graft complications. The procedure has been modified to use various screw types as well as suture buttons. Biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of these implants on construct strength. With varying results it is unclear whether there is an optimal implant to use. Methods We conducted a systematic review of human cadaveric biomechanical studies evaluating Latarjet ultimate failure load. Two independent reviewers screened articles and included them after full text review. Additional factors including implants used, graft orientation, cortices engaged, drill diameter, and screw characteristics were recorded. Meta-regression was performed on the 145 specimens from eight studies that met inclusion criteria. Results Screw fixation resulted in a 396.8 N (95% CI, 149.8–643.7) N higher ultimate failure load against shear stresses than suture buttons (p = 0.002). There were no differences between implants for ultimate failure load against tensile forces. Tensile strength was significantly affected by drill diameter with each millimeter of increase reducing the mean ultimate failure load by 127.4 N (95% CI, 41.2–213.6) N (p = 0.004). Conclusions These results suggest that using screw fixation and minimizing drill diameter can obtain the maximum ultimate failure load against both shear and tensile forces in a Latarjet construct.

As the number of patients receiving total joint replacements continues to rise, considerable attention has been directed towards the early detection and prevention of postoperative complications. While D-dimer has long been studied as a diagnostic tool in venous thromboembolism (VTE), this assay has recently received considerable attention in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). D-dimer values are substantially elevated in the acute postoperative period after total joint arthroplasty, with levels often exceeding the standard institutional cutoff for VTE (500 µg/L). The utility of D-dimer in detecting VTE after total joint replacement is currently limited, and more research to assess its value in the setting of contemporary prophylaxis protocols is warranted. Recent literature supports D-dimer as a good to excellent biomarker for the diagnosis of chronic PJI, especially when using serum sample technique. Providers should exercise caution when interpreting D-dimer levels in patients with inflammatory and hypercoagulability disorders, as the diagnostic value is decreased. The updated 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, which includes D-dimer levels > 860 µg/L as a minor criterion, may be the most accurate for diagnosing chronic PJI to date. Larger prospective trials with transparent lab testing protocols are needed to establish best assay practices and optimal cutoff values for D-dimer in the diagnosis of PJI. This review summarizes the most current literature on the value of D-dimer in total joint arthroplasty and elucidates areas for future progress.

<p class="abstract">Olecranon fractures are often operative when displaced over 2 mm, but the most stable fixation construct is debated. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of biomechanical properties of the most commonly used surgical fixations of olecranon fractures. This systematic review included 13 biomechanical studies comparing displacement during cyclic loading of olecranon fractures fixated with either tension band wiring (TBW), intramedullary screw, or plate fixation. In regard to overall gapping, plates displayed (and screws trended towards) increased stability versus TBW. However, there was no difference between the constructs in gapping at the articular surface. Plating displayed increased stability along the posterior surface. No construct allowed gapping over 2 mm, suggesting safe early post-operative motion with any of the techniques.</p>

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming one of the most frequently sought-after surgeries in orthopedics. As the techniques and implants continue to evolve, the stability of the prosthesis is always at the forefront of the surgeon’s mind. Multiple factors contribute to implant stability and there are many intraoperative decisions that can be made by the surgeon to increase stability. Techniques including approaches, adjusting length, adjusting offset, as well as implant choices can dictate stability in THA. There are multiple options that exist including different liners and constraint. One non modifiable variable which surgeons often struggle with is the spinopelvic relationship which can also affect stability post operatively. These factors include lumbar arthritis, variable pelvic tilt, and others that can make a routine approach to a total hip unsuccessful and increase the risk of post-operative complications. Ultimately there are many things to consider when approaching THA in patients, especially in the setting of abnormal pathology.