No abstract

Failure rate was not impacted by any of the studied variables. Use of suture anchors and concurrent ankle arthroscopy may be favourable options to achieve fewer complications in chronic lateral ankle instability repair surgery.

Introduction: Financial literacy is the individual ability and skill to make informed decisions in the management of resources within the financial marketplace to yield a lifetime of financial well-being. Residents across several subspecialties have demonstrated low levels of financial literacy, and it is thought that more financial education is needed during residency training. The purpose of this study is to perform a comprehensive evaluation on financial literacy and financial attitudes of orthopaedic surgery residents. The authors hypothesize that orthopaedic residents will have low levels of financial literacy and financial satisfaction. Methods: A 46-question anonymous survey was administered through COERG (Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group) to 1028 orthopaedic surgery residents of all postgraduate year at 43 programs with broad national distribution. Resident demographics and survey responses regarding knowledge of finance and investment topics, application of financial principles, and personal financial status were compared. Results: The survey response rate was 48% (494/1028). The average financial literacy score of all orthopaedic resident participants was 60.9% (616.5%). A total of 35.5% of orthopaedic residents were satisfied with their current financial situation. Saving for retirement and lower loan burdens correlated with greater financial satisfaction in financial situation. Scores were higher in orthopaedic residents with greater childhood annual household income, no credit card debt, higher levels of parent education, and active retirement savings plans. Conclusions: Orthopaedic residents show significant deficits in overall financial and investment knowledge combined with a dissatisfaction with financial situations while in residency. Orthopaedic residency programs have the opportunity to implement program-sponsored training and financial resources to enhance the resident education experience.

Introduction The aim of this study was to anatomically compare distal clavicle and coracoid autografts and their potential to augment anterior-inferior glenoid bone loss. Methods Ten millimeters of distal clavicle and 20 mm of coracoid were harvested bilaterally from 32 cadavers. Length, weight, and height were measured and surface area and density were calculated. For each graft, ipsilateral measurements were compared and the ability to restore corresponding glenoid bone loss was calculated. Results Distal clavicle grafts were larger than coracoid grafts with respect to length (22.3 mm versus 17.7 mm; p < 0.001), height (12.49 mm versus 9.65 mm; p < 0.001), mass (2.72 g versus 2.45 g; p = 0.0437), and volume (2.36 cm3 versus 1.96 cm3; p = 0.002). Coracoid grafts had larger widths (14.56 mm versus 10.52 mm; p < 0.001) and greater density (1.24 g/cm3 versus 1.18 g/cm3; p < 0.001). Distal clavicle surface area was greater on both the articular (2.93 cm2 versus 1.5 cm2; p < 0.001) and superior surfaces (2.76 cm2 versus 1.5 cm2; p < 0.001) when compared to lateral coracoid surface area. Discussion Distal clavicle grafts were larger and restored larger bony defects but had greater variability and lower density than coracoid grafts. Clinical studies are needed to compare these graft options.

Objectives: To identify a group of ballistic tibia fractures, report the outcomes of these fractures, and compare them with both closed and open tibia fractures sustained by blunt mechanisms. We hypothesized that ballistic tibia fractures and blunt open fractures would have similar outcomes. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: A single Level-1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: Adult patients presenting with ballistic (44), blunt closed (179), or blunt open (179) tibia fractures. Intervention: Intramedullary stabilization of tibia fracture. Main Outcomes: Unplanned reoperation, soft tissue reconstruction, nonunion, compartment syndrome, and fracture-related infection. Results: Compared with the blunt closed group, the ballistic fracture group required more operations (P < 0.01), had a higher occurrence of soft tissue reconstruction (P < 0.01), and higher incidence of compartment syndrome (P = 0.02). Ballistic and blunt closed groups did not significantly differ in rates of unplanned reoperation (P = 0.67), nonunion (11.4% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.08), or deep infection (9.1% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.49). In comparison to the blunt open group, the ballistic group required a similar number of operations (P = 0.12), had similar rates of unplanned reoperation (P = 0.10), soft tissue reconstruction (P = 0.56), nonunion (11.4% vs. 17.9%, P = 0.49), and fracture-related infection (9.1% vs. 10.1%, P = 1.0) but a higher incidence of compartment syndrome (15.9% vs. 5.0%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: Ballistic tibia fractures require more surgeries and have higher rates of soft tissue reconstruction than blunt closed fractures and seem to have outcomes similar to lower severity open fractures. We found a significantly higher rate of compartment syndrome in ballistic tibia fractures than both open and closed blunt fractures. When treating ballistic tibia fractures, surgeons should maintain a high level of suspicion for the development of compartment syndrome and counsel patients that ballistic tibia fractures seem to behave like an intermediate category between closed and open fractures sustained through blunt mechanisms. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.