Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a complex heterogeneous disease characterized by the absence of three hallmark receptors: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor. Compared to other breast cancer subtypes, TNBC is more aggressive, has a higher prevalence in African-Americans, and more frequently affects younger patients. Currently, TNBC lacks clinically accepted targets for tailored therapy, warranting the need for candidate biomarkers. BiomarkerBase, an online platform used to find biomarkers reported in clinical trials, was utilized to screen all potential biomarkers for TNBC and select only the ones registered in completed TNBC trials through clinicaltrials.gov. The selected candidate biomarkers were classified as surrogate, prognostic, predictive, or pharmacodynamic (PD) and organized by location in the blood, on the cell surface, in the cytoplasm, or in the nucleus. Blood biomarkers include vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and interleukin-8 (IL-8); cell surface biomarkers include EGFR, insulin-like growth factor binding protein, c-Kit, c-Met, and PD-L1; cytoplasm biomarkers include PIK3CA, pAKT/S6/p4E-BP1, PTEN, ALDH1, and the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR-related metabolites; and nucleus biomarkers include BRCA1, the gluco-corticoid receptor, TP53, and Ki67. Candidate biomarkers were further organized into a “cellular protein network” that demonstrates potential connectivity. This review provides an inventory and reference point for promising biomarkers for breakthrough targeted therapies in TNBC.

No abstract

Background Doxorubicin (DOX) and its pegylated liposomal formulation (L_DOX) are the standard of care for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, resistance to DOX often occurs, motivating the search for alternative treatment approaches. The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) is a potential pharmacological target for TNBC treatment since its expression has been associated with resistance to DOX-based therapy. Methods DOX (0.01–20 μM) combination with abemaciclib (ABE, 1–6 μM) was evaluated over 72 hours on Rb-positive (MDA-MB-231) and Rb-negative (MDA-MB-468) TNBC cells. Combination indices (CI) for DOX+ABE were calculated using Compusyn software. The TNBC cell viability time-course and fold-change from the control of phosphorylated-Rb (pRb) protein expression were measured with CCK8-kit and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A cell-based pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed, where pRb protein dynamics drove cell viability response. Clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) models for DOX, L_DOX, and ABE were developed using data extracted from the literature. After scaling cancer cell growth to clinical TNBC tumor growth, the time-to-tumor progression (TTP) was predicted for human dosing regimens of DOX, ABE, and DOX+ABE. Results DOX and ABE combinations were synergistic (CI<1) in MDA-MB-231 and antagonistic (CI>1) in MDA-MB-468. The maximum inhibitory effects (Imax) for both drugs were set to one. The drug concentrations producing 50% of Imax for DOX and ABE were 0.565 and 2.31 μM (MDA-MB-231) and 0.121 and 1.61 μM (MDA-MB-468). The first-orders rate constants of abemaciclib absorption (k a ) and doxorubicin release from L_DOX (k Rel ) were estimated at 0.31 and 0.013 h −1 . Their linear clearances were 21.7 (ABE) and 32.1 L/h (DOX). The estimated TTP for intravenous DOX (75 mg/m2 every 21 days), intravenous L_DOX (50 mg/m 2 every 28 days), and oral ABE (200 mg twice a day) were 125, 31.2, and 8.6 days shorter than drug-free control. The TTP for DOX+ABE and L_DOX+ABE were 312 days and 47.5 days shorter than control, both larger than single-agent DOX, suggesting improved activity with the DOX+ABE combination. Conclusion The developed translational systems-based PK/PD model provides an in vitro-to-clinic modeling platform for DOX+ABE in TNBC. Although model-based simulations suggest improved outcomes with combination over monotherapy, tumor relapse was not prevented with the combination. Hence, DOX+ABE may not be an effective treatment combination for TNBC.

No abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer that tests negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptors 2 (HER2). It is aggressive and invasive in nature and lacks targeted therapy.Purpose: The EGFR is frequently overexpressed in TNBC, and the EGFR-overexpressing TNBC presumably escapes EGFR inhibitor therapy by upregulating autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis.Methods: To parse the autophagy–apoptosis crosstalk pathway as a potential targeted therapy in TNBC, the activity of an EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib, alone and in combination with an autophagy inhibitor, chloroquine, was examined in EGFR-overexpressing TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231. The nature of interaction between both drugs at various concentrations was determined by calculating combination indexes (CI) using CompuSyn software. Temporal changes in the expression of the autophagy marker, LC3B-II, and several apoptosis signaling molecules were measured using Western blot and luminex assay with MAGPIX® after exposure to drugs. A synergistic interaction (CI <1) was identified with combinations of 4–6.5 μM osimertinib with 30–75 μM chloroquine.Results: A combination of osimertinib (6 μM) with chloroquine (30 μM) resulted in a 6-fold increase of LC3B-II relative to control compared to 2.5-fold increase for either drug alone. The caspase-3 expression increased 2-fold compared to a 0.5-fold decrease with chloroquine and 1.5-fold increase with osimertinib.Conclusion: Our results indicate that inhibition of the autophagic flux via chloroquine improves the effectiveness of osimertinib in TNBC cancer cells, warranting further investigations of this combination in vivo.