Mechanisms responsible for the success or failure of agricultural diversification are often unknown. Most studies of arthropod pest management focus on enhancing natural enemy effectiveness. However, non‐crop plants can also change crop host quality by reducing or adding soil nutrients or water, and therefore improve or hamper pest suppression. Native perennial ground covers may provide food or habitat to natural enemies and, in terms of competition for soil nutrients or water, be more compatible with crop management than exotic annuals.
We conducted a 3‐year vineyard study to examine the impacts of native perennial grasses on pests, natural enemies, crop plant condition and soil properties. We included three ground cover treatments: bare soil with a grower standard drip irrigation; native grasses with drip irrigation; and native grasses with drip irrigation as well as an additional flood irrigation to keep the grasses green and growing during the season.
Numbers of leafhopper pests Erythroneura spp. decreased in both native grass treatments, where parasitism rates were higher. Vine petiole nitrate levels were lower in grass treatments, indicating competition for soil nitrogen, which is most often considered to be detrimental. Berry weight was higher in the irrigated treatment but did not differ between the bare soil and non‐irrigated grass treatment. Grape °Brix was similar in the bare soil and native grass treatments, suggesting native grasses did not compromise grape quality. In fact, leaf water stress was lower and soil moisture higher not only in the irrigated grass treatment but, at times, in the non‐irrigated grass treatment, compared with the bare soil treatment.
Synthesis and applications. Our work shows that native grasses contribute to a reduction in vineyard leafhopper pests by reducing host quality through competition for soil nitrogen and providing food resources and/or habitat for natural enemies. Native grasses also improve soil water content and may be part of a water conservation program for perennial crops in dry climate regions.
The reduction in floral diversity that often accompanies agricultural intensification may compromise the effectiveness of many natural enemies. Field studies examining the effects of floral resources on natural enemy fitness have been rare, however, particularly for predators such as hoverflies. Making the link between the presence of floral resources and the suppression of herbivores in crop fields has proved difficult. We investigated the effects of the floral resource plant sweet alyssum, Lobularia maritima (L.) Desv. (Brassicaceae), on aphid suppression by the hoverfly Eupeodes fumipennis (Thomson) (Diptera: Syrphidae) in California lettuce fields. The presence of alyssum in field cages significantly enhanced hoverfly egg production, resulting in more hoverfly larvae and fewer aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Hoverfly survival was unaffected by alyssum, indicating that the indirect effect of alyssum on aphids was mediated primarily through the reproductive component of hoverfly fitness. Alyssum and other plant species are used to enhance resources for natural enemies in agricultural landscapes, and the results of this study provide some of the clearest evidence to date that increasing floral resource availability can enhance pest suppression and crop quality through elevated natural enemy fitness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.