Introduction: The effect of physical-distancing policies and school closures on pediatric health has been a topic of major concern in the United States during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The objective of this study was to assess the immediate impact of these public policies on patterns of head and facial trauma in the pediatric population. Materials and Method: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was queried to identify patient encounters at 46 children’s hospitals across the United States in 2016–2020. Encounters were included if resultant in ICD-10 diagnosis for head or facial trauma in a child under 18 between April 1 and June 30 in 2020 (first COVID-19 school closures) and during the same period in the previous 4 years (for comparison). Results: A total of 170,832 patient encounters for pediatric head and facial trauma were recorded during the study period, including 28,030 (16.4%) in 2020 and 142,802 (83.6%) in 2016–2019. Patient encounters declined significantly in 2020 among children of all age groups relative to previous years. Relative reductions were greatest in children aged 11 to 17 (middle/high school) and 6 to 10 (elementary school), at −34.6% (95% confidence interval: −23.6%, −44%; P <0.001) and −27.7% (95% confidence interval: −18.4%, −36%; P <0.001). Variation in relative reductions by race/ethnicity, sex, and rural/urban status were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Physical-distancing policies and school closures at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic correlated with significant reductions in pediatric head and facial trauma patient encounters. As in-person activities resume, reductions in head and facial trauma during the pandemic may indicate a range of possible preventable injuries in the future.

Introduction: Evidence-based protocols identifying COVID-19 cases in pediatric preoperative settings are lacking. With COVID-19 positioned to remain a threat to children, this study examines effectiveness of preoperative COVID-19 symptom screening in pediatric patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included hospital billing/medical record queries of (1) procedures performed under conscious sedation/general anesthesia and (2) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (+) cases from April 6, 2020, to June 15, 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed for demographic, procedural, symptom, and COVID-19 test result data obtained from medical records. Bivariate analyses examined associations between SARS-CoV-2 test results and symptom, demographic, and procedural data. Results: Among 2900 surgical cases, median (interquartile range) age was 8.1 (12.8) years. The majority were male (n = 1609, 55.5%), white (n = 1614, 55.7%), and not Hispanic/Latino (n = 1658, 57.2%). Additionally, 85.4% (n = 2412) of cases were non-emergent. Fifteen COVID-19 (+) cases were identified, for a 0.5% positivity rate. COVID-19 positivity was not associated with sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, or preoperative symptom status. Notably, 92.9% (n = 13) of COVID-19 (+) cases were asymptomatic. COVID-19 (+) patients were significantly older (15.6 years) than COVID-19 (−) patients (8.0 years). Patients who were not white, were Hispanic/Latino, or had a relatively lower economic status, were more likely to test positive. Conclusions: Preoperative symptom screenings insufficiently identified COVID-19 (+) patients. During outbreaks, testing protocols should be implemented to identify COVID-19 (+) patients. Future research should examine if observations are similar for other variants, and how health disparities associate with COVID-19.