No abstract

Purpose of review Occupational exposures remain an underrecognized and preventable cause of lung disease in high-income countries. The present review highlights the emergence of cleaning-related respiratory disease and the re-emergence of silicosis as examples of trends in occupational lung diseases in the 21st century. Recent findings Employment trends, such as the shift from large-scale manufacturing to a service economy, the growth of the healthcare sector, and changing consumer products have changed the spectrum of work-related lung diseases. Following decades of progress in reducing traditional hazards such as silica in U.S. workplaces, cases of advanced silicosis have recently re-emerged with the production of engineered stone countertops. With growth in the healthcare and service sectors in the United States, cleaning products have become an important cause of work-related asthma and have recently been associated with an increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in women. However, these occupational lung diseases largely go unrecognized by practicing clinicians. Summary The present article highlights how changes in the economy and work structure can lead to new patterns of inhalational workplace hazards and respiratory disease, including cleaning-related respiratory disease and silicosis. Pulmonary clinicians need to be able to recognize and diagnose these occupational lung diseases, which requires a high index of suspicion and a careful occupational history.

Objective: Prior studies of universal masking have not measured facemask compliance. We performed a quality improvement study to monitor and improve facemask compliance among healthcare personnel (HCP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Design: Mixed-methods study Setting: Tertiary care center in West Haven, Connecticut Patients: HCP including physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff Methods: Facemask compliance was measured through direct observations during a 4-week baseline period after universal masking was mandated. Frontline and management HCP completed semi-structured interviews from which a multimodal intervention was developed. Direct observations were repeated during a 14-week period following implementation of the multimodal intervention. Differences between units were evaluated with chi-squared testing using the Bonferroni correction. Facemask compliance between baseline and intervention periods was compared using time series regression. Results: Among 1,561 observations during the baseline period, median weekly facemask compliance was 82.2% (range, 80.8%-84.4%). Semi-structured interviews were performed with 16 HCP. Qualitative analysis informed the development of a multimodal intervention consisting of audit and passive feedback, active discussion, and increased communication from leadership. Among 2,651 observations during the intervention period, median weekly facemask compliance was 92.6% (range, 84.6%-97.9%). There was no difference in weekly facemask compliance between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 units. The multimodal intervention was associated with an increase in facemask compliance (β=0.023, p=0.002) Conclusions: Facemask compliance remained suboptimal among HCP despite a facility-wide mandate for universal masking. A multimodal intervention consisting of audit and passive feedback, active discussion, and increased communication from leadership was effective in increasing facemask compliance among HCP.