Behavioral research in cognitive and human systems neuroscience has been largely carried out in-person in laboratory settings. Underpowering and lack of reproducibility due to small sample sizes have weakened conclusions of these investigations. In other disciplines, such as neuroeconomics and social sciences, crowdsourcing has been extensively utilized as a data collection tool, and a means to increase sample sizes. Recent methodological advances allow scientists, for the first time, to test online more complex cognitive, perceptual, and motor tasks. Here we review the nascent literature on the use of online crowdsourcing in cognitive and human systems neuroscience. These investigations take advantage of the ability to reliably track the activity of a participant’s computer keyboard, mouse, and eye gaze in the context of large-scale studies online that involve diverse research participant pools. Crowdsourcing allows for testing the generalizability of behavioral hypotheses in real-life environments that are less accessible to lab-designed investigations. Crowdsourcing is further useful when in-laboratory studies are limited, for example during the current COVID-19 pandemic. We also discuss current limitations of crowdsourcing research, and suggest pathways to address them. We conclude that online crowdsourcing is likely to widen the scope and strengthen conclusions of cognitive and human systems neuroscience investigations.
The thyroid hormones (THs), thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3), are under homeostatic control by the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and plasma TH binding proteins (THBPs), including thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG), transthyretin (TTR), and albumin (ALB). THBPs buffer free THs against transient perturbations and distribute THs to tissues. TH binding to THBPs can be perturbed by structurally similar endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), yet their impact on circulating THs and health risks are unclear. In the present study, we constructed a human physiologically based kinetic (PBK) model of THs and explored the potential effects of THBP-binding EDCs. The model describes the production, distribution, and metabolism of T4 and T3 in the Body Blood, Thyroid, Liver, and Rest-of-Body (RB) compartments, with explicit consideration of the reversible binding between plasma THs and THBPs. Rigorously parameterized based on literature data, the model recapitulates key quantitative TH kinetic characteristics, including free, THBP-bound, and total T4 and T3 concentrations, TH productions, distributions, metabolisms, clearance, and half-lives. Moreover, the model produces several novel findings. (1) The blood-tissue TH exchanges are fast and nearly at equilibrium especially for T4, providing intrinsic robustness against local metabolic perturbations. (2) Tissue influx is limiting for transient tissue uptake of THs when THBPs are present. (3) Continuous exposure to THBP-binding EDCs does not alter the steady-state levels of THs, while intermittent daily exposure to rapidly metabolized TBG-binding EDCs can cause much greater disruptions to plasma and tissue THs. In summary, the PBK model provides novel insights into TH kinetics and the homeostatic roles of THBPs against thyroid disrupting chemicals.
Sleep is an important component of motor memory consolidation and learning, providing a critical tool to enhance training and rehabilitation. Following initial skill acquisition, memory consolidation is largely a result of non‐rapid eye movement sleep over either a full night or a nap. Targeted memory reactivation is one method used to enhance this critical process, which involves the pairing of an external cue with task performance at the time of initial motor skill acquisition, followed by replay of the same cue during sleep. Application of targeted memory reactivation during sleep leads to increased functional connectivity within task‐related brain networks and improved behavioural performance in healthy young adults. We have previously used targeted memory reactivation throughout the first two slow‐wave sleep cycles of a full night of sleep to enhance non‐dominant arm throwing accuracy in healthy young adults. Here, we aimed to determine whether application of targeted memory reactivation throughout a 1‐hr daytime nap was sufficient to enhance performance on the same non‐dominant arm throwing task in healthy young adults. Participants were allocated to either nap or no nap, and within those groups half received targeted memory reactivation throughout a 1‐hr between‐session period, leading to four groups. Only participants who slept between sessions while receiving targeted memory reactivation enhanced their throwing accuracy upon beginning the second session. Future studies will aim to use this technique as an adjunct to traditional physical rehabilitation with individuals with neurologic diagnoses such as stroke.
The benefits of sleep on memory consolidation have been enhanced for declarative and motor sequence learning through replaying classically conditioned auditory stimuli during sleep, known as targeted memory reactivation (TMR). However, it is unknown if TMR can influence performance of a sensorimotor skill, in the absence of the cognitive requirements of sequence learning. Here, young adults performed a nondominant arm throwing task separated by a full night of sleep or a full day of wake, with half of all participants receiving TMR between sessions. Participants who received TMR during sleep demonstrated enhanced sensorimotor performance relative to all other groups. In conclusion, this pilot study indicates that it is feasible to influence sensorimotor skill performance through TMR during sleep and may serve as a future adjunct to physical rehabilitation. Future studies will aim to confirm the present results with a larger sample size as well as investigate the effects of TMR during sleep on older adults both with and without a history of stroke.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.