No abstract

SummaryBackground Previous trials have shown that anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies can improve clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We assessed the effi cacy and safety of panitumumab combined with cisplatin and fl uorouracil as fi rst-line treatment for these patients.

BackgroundCemiplimab, a high-affinity, potent human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody to programmed cell death-1 demonstrated antitumor activity in a Phase 1 advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) expansion cohort (NCT02383212) and the pivotal Phase 2 study (NCT02760498). Here we report the primary analysis of fixed dose cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) (Group 3) and provide a longer-term update after the primary analysis of weight-based cemiplimab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks (Q2W) (Group 1) among metastatic CSCC (mCSCC) patients in the pivotal study (NCT02760498).MethodsThe primary objective for each group was objective response rate (ORR) per independent central review (ICR). Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator review (INV), duration of response (DOR) per ICR and INV, and safety and tolerability.ResultsFor Group 3 (n=56) and Group 1 (n=59), median follow-up was 8.1 (range, 0.6 to 14.1) and 16.5 (range, 1.1 to 26.6) months, respectively. ORR per ICR was 41.1% (95% CI, 28.1% to 55.0%) in Group 3, 49.2% (95% CI, 35.9% to 62.5%) in Group 1, and 45.2% (95% CI, 35.9% to 54.8%) in both groups combined. Per ICR, Kaplan–Meier estimate for DOR at 8 months was 95.0% (95% CI, 69.5% to 99. 3%) in responding patients in Group 3, and at 12 months was 88.9% (95% CI, 69.3% to 96.3%) in responding patients in Group 1. Per INV, ORR was 51.8% (95% CI, 38.0% to 65.3%) in Group 3, 49.2% (95% CI, 35.9% to 62.5%) in Group 1, and 50.4% (95% CI, 41.0% to 59.9%) in both groups combined. Overall, the most common adverse events regardless of attribution were fatigue (27.0%) and diarrhea (23.5%).ConclusionIn patients with mCSCC, cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously Q3W produced substantial antitumor activity with durable response and an acceptable safety profile. Follow-up data of cemiplimab 3 mg/kg intravenously Q2W demonstrate ongoing durability of responses.Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02760498. Registered May 3, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02760498

Background. Cancer is most common in older age groups, but little information is available with regard to the impact of age on chemotherapy toxicity. This study was undertaken to determine if age is an independent risk factor for 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) toxicity. Methods. Toxicity data from a prospective, randomized, multiinstitution trial of 5‐FU‐based treatment for advanced colorectal cancer were analyzed. Toxicity for each organ system was graded. Individual organ toxicity proportions were compared using chi‐square analysis. A logistic regression was performed using age (younger than 70 years vs. 70 years or older), sex, treatment arm, performance status, and length of therapy as model parameters to predict severe toxicity. Toxicity in 331 patients was analyzed. Results. Advanced age was significantly associated with the occurrence of any severe toxicity (58 vs. 36%, P < 0.001), leukopenia (24 vs. 10%, P < 0.005), diarrhea (24 vs. 14%, P = 0.01), vomiting (15 vs. 5%, P = 0.01), severe toxicity in more than 2 organ systems (10 vs. 3%, P = 0.02), and treatment mortality (9 vs. 2%, P = 0.01). By univariate analysis, age (P < 0.001) and sex (P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of severe toxicity. Twenty‐two of 27 women age 70 years or older had severe toxicity. Conclusions. Age 70 years or older and sex are risk factors for severe toxicity from 5‐FU‐based chemotherapy. Advanced age does not contraindicate the use of this type of chemotherapy, but close monitoring for multiple organ toxicities and vigorous supportive care of those with toxicity are required. Dosing decisions in older patients are difficult and must integrate assessments of organ function, comorbidities, overall physical status, and goals of treatment, in an effort to ensure the best possible outcome for these patients.

In 2002/2003 a number of patients presented to the South Australian Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit with unusual non‐healing extraction wounds of the jaws. All were middle‐aged to elderly, medically compromised and on bisphosphonates for bone pathology. Review of the literature showed similar cases being reported in the North American oral and maxillofacial surgery literature. This paper reviews the role of bisphosphonates in the management of bone disease. There were 2.3 million prescriptions for bisphosphonates in Australia in 2003. This group of drugs is very useful in controlling bone pain and preventing pathologic fractures. However, in a small number of patients on bisphosphonates, intractable, painful, non‐healing exposed bone occurs following dental extractions or denture irritation. Affected patients are usually, but not always, over 55 years, medically compromised and on the potent nitrogen containing bisphosphonates, pamidronate (Aredia/Pamisol), alendronate (Fosamax) and zolendronate (Zometa) for non‐osteoporotic bone disease. Currently, there is no simple, effective treatment and the painful exposed bone may persist for years. The main complications are marked weight loss from difficulty in eating and severe jaw and neck infections. Possible preventive and therapeutic strategies are presented although at this time there is no evidence of their effectiveness. Dentists must ask about bisphosphonate usage for bone disease when recording medical histories and take appropriate actions to avoid the development of this debilitating condition in their patients.