Opioids are commonly prescribed for chronic back pain and may be efficacious for short-term pain relief. Long-term efficacy (> or =16 weeks) is unclear. Substance use disorders are common in patients taking opioids for back pain, and aberrant medication-taking behaviors occur in up to 24% of cases.

Context Cocaine dependence, which affects 2.5 million Americans annually, has no FDA approved pharmacotherapy. Objective To evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of a novel cocaine vaccine to treat cocaine dependence. Design 24 week Phase IIb randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with efficacy assessed during weeks 8 to 20 and follow-up to week 24. Setting Cocaine and opioid dependent persons recruited from 2003–2005 from greater New Haven, CT. Participants 115 methadone maintained subjects (67% male, 87% Caucasian, aged 18–46) were randomized to vaccine or placebo and 82% completed the trial. Most smoked crack cocaine along with using marijuana (18%), alcohol (10%), and non-prescription opioids (44%). Intervention Over 12 weeks 109/115 subjects received five vaccinations of placebo or succinylnorcocaine linked to cholera B protein. Main Outcome Measure Semi-quantitative urinary cocaine metabolite levels measured thrice weekly with positive cutoff of 300 ng/ml. Results The 38% of vaccinated subjects who attained serum IgG anti-cocaine levels ≥ 43 µg/mL (high IgG) had significantly more cocaine-free urines than those with < 43 µg/mL (low IgG) and the placebo subjects during weeks 9 to 16 (45% vs 35%). The proportion of subjects having a 50% reduction in cocaine use was significantly greater in the high IgG than low IgG subjects (0.53 vs. 0.23) (P<0.04). The most common side effects were injection site induration and tenderness. There were no treatment related serious adverse events, withdrawals, or deaths. Conclusions Attaining high (≥ 43 µg/mL) IgG anti-cocaine antibody levels was associated with significantly reduced cocaine use, but only 38% of the vaccinated attained these IgG levels and they had only 2 months of adequate cocaine blockade. Thus, we need improved vaccines and boosters.

Median time to tumor progression was 9.9 months for schedule 4/2 and 7.1 months for the CDD schedule (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.04; P = .090). No significant difference was observed in overall survival (23.1 v 23.5 months; P = .615), commonly reported adverse events, or patient-reported kidney cancer symptoms. Schedule 4/2 was statistically superior to CDD in time to deterioration, a composite end point of death, progression, and disease-related symptoms (P = .034). CONCLUSION; There was no benefit in efficacy or safety for continuous dosing of sunitinib compared with the approved 50 mg/d dose on schedule 4/2. Given the numerically longer time to tumor progression with the approved 50 mg/d dose on schedule 4/2, adherence to this dose and schedule remains the treatment goal for patients with advanced RCC.