Purpose To inform research on developing or adopting leadership competency frameworks for use in U.S. undergraduate medical education (UME), this scoping review describes the content of U.S. UME leadership curricula, associated competency frameworks, and content delivery. Method The authors searched PubMed, Embase, and ERIC databases on June 22, 2020. They included English-language studies that described U.S. UME curricula in which the primary end goal was leadership development. They excluded studies published before January 1, 2000. Data were extracted on leadership competency frameworks and curricular content, audience, duration, electivity, selectivity, learning pedagogies, and outcome measures. The curricular content was coded and categorized within the Medical Leadership Competency Framework (MLCF) using the constant comparative method. A repeated search of the literature on May 14, 2021, did not yield any additional studies. Results Of 1,094 unique studies, 25 studies reporting on 25 curricula met inclusion criteria. The course content of the curricula was organized into 91 distinct themes, most of which could be organized into the first 2 competencies of the MLCF: Demonstrating Personal Qualities and Working With Others. Thirteen curricula (52%) aligned with leadership competency frameworks, and 12 (48%) did not appear to use a framework. Number of participants and target learner level varied widely, as did curricula duration, with fewer than half (n = 12, 48%) spanning more than 1 semester. Most curricula (n = 14, 56%) were elective, and many (n = 16, 64%) offered experiential learning. Most studies (n = 16, 64%) reported outcomes as student perception data. Conclusions The authors found wide variation in content of U.S. UME leadership development curricula, and few curricula aligned with an established leadership competency framework. The lack of professional consensus on the scope of medical leadership and how it should be taught thwarts effective incorporation of medical leadership training within UME.

IMPORTANCEMany women in the US, particularly those living in rural areas, have limited access to obstetric care. Military-civilian partnership could improve access to obstetric care and benefit military personnel, their civilian dependents, and the civilian population as a whole. OBJECTIVE To identify medical facilities within military and civilian geographic areas that present opportunities for military-civilian partnership in obstetric care and to assess whether civilian use of military medical treatment facilities (MTFs) could improve access to emergency cesarean delivery care in the US. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis geospatial epidemiological population-based crosssectional study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. ArcGIS Pro software, version 2.7 (Esri), was used to assess population coverage for TRICARE (military insurance) beneficiaries and civilian populations and to estimate 30-minute travel time to 2392 total military and civilian medical facilities that were capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care in the continental US. Data on health insurance coverage for TRICARE beneficiaries and their civilian dependents per county were obtained from the American Community Survey tables available through ArcGIS Pro software. Demographic characteristics of the general population were obtained from the 2020 key demographic indicators published by Esri. Race and ethnicity were not examined because the data used for this study were aggregated and did not include further categorization by race or ethnicity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPopulation coverage rates (measured in percentages) within 30-minute catchment areas, defined as areas that were within a 30-minute travel time to a medical facility capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care. RESULTSA total of 29 MTFs and 2363 civilian hospitals capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery were identified across the contiguous US. Overall, an estimated 167 759 762 women (3 640 000 TRICARE beneficiaries and 164 119 762 civilians) were included in these service areas.The analysis identified 17 of 29 MTFs (58.6%) capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care that were located within 30-minute catchment areas. Of those, 3 MTFs were the only facilities capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care within a 30-minute travel time in those regions, and 14 additional MTFs had catchment areas partially overlapping with civilian hospitals that also covered areas without alternative access to emergency cesarean delivery. Expanded use of these 14 MTFs could enhance access to emergency cesarean delivery care not otherwise covered by current civilian hospitals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this study, 58.6% of MTFs capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care were located in areas with the potential to improve access to obstetric care within a 30-minute travel time. Maintenance of MTFs in these important access regions could be (continued) Key Points Question Could military medical treatment facilities (MTFs) improve...

Introduction Emergency department (ED) utilization represents an expensive and growing means of accessing care for a variety of conditions. Prior studies have characterized ED utilization in the general population. We aim to identify the clinical conditions that drive ED utilization in a universally insured population and the impacts of care setting on ED use and admissions in the U.S. Military Health System. Methods We queried TRICARE claims data from October 1, 2012, to September 30, 2015, to identify all ED visits for adult patients (age 18-64). The primary presenting diagnoses of all ED visits and those leading to admission are presented with descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with admission from the ED. Results A total of 4,687,205 ED visits were identified, of which 46% took place in the DoD healthcare facilities (direct care). The most common diagnoses across all ED visits were abdominal pain, chest pain, headache, nausea and vomiting, and urinary tract infection. A total of 270,127 (5.8%) ED visits led to inpatient admission. The most common diagnoses leading to admission were chest pain, abdominal pain, depression, conditions relating to acute psychological stress, and pneumonia. For patients presenting with 1 of the 10 most common ED diagnoses, those who were seen at a civilian ED were significantly less likely to be admitted (3.4%) compared to direct care facilities (4.1%) in an adjusted logistic regression model (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.40 [95% CI: 0.40-0.41], P < .001). Conclusions Ultimately, we show that abdominal pain and chest pain are the most common reasons for presentation to the ED in the Military Health System and the most common presenting diagnoses for admission from the ED. Among patients presenting with the most common ED conditions, direct care EDs were significantly more likely to admit patients than civilian facilities.

Shoulder pain is a common and painful patient condition. Unfortunately, diagnostic imaging of shoulder pain in the emergency department (ED) is often limited to radiography. While diagnostic for fractures and dislocations, drawbacks of radiography include time delays and non-diagnostic imaging in the case of rotator cuff pathology. While bedside ultrasound has been incorporated into many procedural and diagnostic applications in the ED, its use for musculoskeletal complaints and specifically shoulder pain is infrequent among ED clinicians. The incorporation of shoulder ultrasound in the ED may improve diagnostic certainty while decreasing time to diagnosis and treatment, yielding patient and health system benefits. Herein, we present the ABSIS (Acromio-clavicular joint, Biceps, Subscapularis, Impingement, Supraspinatus) Protocol for performing bedside ultrasound of the shoulder including the rotator cuff and bony anatomy.