With an optimized algorithm, phenotypic PI resistance can be predicted by viral genotype with good sensitivity (89.1-93.0%) and specificity (82.6-93.3%). The reliability and relevance of this algorithm should be further evaluated in clinical practice.

The therapeutic success of an antiretroviral salvage regimen containing protease inhibitors (PI) is limited by PI-resistant viral strains exhibiting various degrees of resistance and cross-resistance. To evaluate the extent of cross-resistance to the new PI amprenavir, 155 samples from 132 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients were analyzed for viral genotype by direct sequencing of the protease gene. Concomitantly, drug sensitivity to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, and amprenavir was analyzed by a recombinant virus assay. A total of 111 patients had been pretreated with 1-4 PI, but all were naive to amprenavir. A total of 105 samples (67.7%) were sensitive to amprenavir; 25 samples (16.1%) were intermediately resistant, and another 25 samples were highly resistant (4-to 8-fold-and >8-fold-reduced sensitivity, respectively). The mutations 46I/L, 54L/V, 84V, and 90M showed the strongest association with amprenavir resistance (P < 0.0001). The scoring system using 84V and/or any two of a number of mutations (10I/R/V/F, 46I/L, 54L/V, and 90M) predicted amprenavir resistance with a sensitivity of 86.0% and a specificity of 81.0% within the analyzed group of samples. Of 62 samples with resistance against 4 PI, 23 (37.1%) were still sensitive to amprenavir. In comparison, only 2 of 23 samples (8.7%) from nelfinavir-naive patients with resistance against indinavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir were still sensitive to nelfinavir. Amprenavir thus appears to be an interesting alternative for PI salvage therapy.

In order to analyse whether drug sensitivity testing would be beneficial for clinical decision-making in heavily pretreated patients, we retrospectively studied viral genotype and phenotypic drug resistance in 12 HIV-1-infected patients, each of them with a history of failing at least one therapeutic regimen including one or two protease inhibitors (PIs). The salvage therapy included nelfinavir as new PI in all cases. Four patients showed a sustained and five patients a transient viral load decrease. Three patients failed to show a significant decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA. In the baseline samples of these cases, resistance against all components of their combination therapy could be detected, whereas at least one antiretroviral drug was still active in the cases with transient treatment response. All patients with sustained therapy response harboured viruses that were either fully sensitive or resistant to only one of the drugs administered. In our study, phenotypic drug resistance was predictive for the success of antiretroviral salvage regimens.