No abstract

Our lab showed that administration of dexamethasone (DEX) stimulated myogenesis and resulted in advanced structure in our engineered skeletal muscle units (SMU). While administration of 25 nM DEX resulted in the most advanced structure, 10 nM dosing resulted in the greatest force production. We hypothesized that administration of 25 nM DEX during the entire fabrication process was toxic to the cells and that administration of DEX at precise time points during myogenesis would result in SMU with a more advanced structure and function. Thus, we fabricated SMU with 25 nM DEX administered at early proliferation (days 0–4), late proliferation (days 3–5), and early differentiation (days 5–7) stages of myogenesis and compared them to SMU treated with 10 nM DEX (days 0–16). Cell proliferation was measured with a BrdU assay (day 4) and myogenesis was examined by immunostaining for MyoD (day 4), myogenin (day 7), and α-actinin (day 11). Following SMU formation, isometric tetanic force production was measured. An analysis of cell proliferation indicated that 25 nM DEX administered at early proliferation (days 0–4) provided 21.5% greater myogenic proliferation than 10 nM DEX (days 0–4). In addition, 25 nM DEX administered at early differentiation (days 5–7) showed the highest density of myogenin-positive cells, demonstrating the greatest improvement in differentiation of myoblasts. However, the most advanced sarcomeric structure and the highest force production were exhibited with sustained administration of 10 nM DEX (days 0–16). In conclusion, alteration of the timing of 25 nM DEX administration did not enhance the structure or function of our SMU. SMU were optimally fabricated with sustained administration of 10 nM DEX.

No abstract

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is the loss of skeletal muscle that results in significant and persistent impairment of function. The unique characteristics of craniofacial muscle compared trunk and limb skeletal muscle, including differences in gene expression, satellite cell phenotype, and regenerative capacity, suggest that VML injuries may affect craniofacial muscle more severely. However, despite these notable differences, there are currently no animal models of craniofacial VML. In a previous sheep hindlimb VML study, we showed that our lab's tissue engineered skeletal muscle units (SMUs) were able to restore muscle force production to a level that was statistically indistinguishable from the uninjured contralateral muscle. Thus, the goals of this study were to: 1) develop a model of craniofacial VML in a large animal model and 2) to evaluate the efficacy of our SMUs in repairing a 30% VML in the ovine zygomaticus major muscle. Overall, there was no significant difference in functional recovery between the SMU-treated group and the unrepaired control. Despite the use of the same injury and repair model used in our previous study, results showed differences in pathophysiology between craniofacial and hindlimb VML. Specifically, the craniofacial model was affected by concomitant denervation and ischemia injuries that were not exhibited in the hindlimb model. While clinically realistic, the additional ischemia and denervation likely created an injury that was too severe for our SMUs to repair. This study highlights the importance of balancing the use of a clinically realistic model while also maintaining control over variables related to the severity of the injury. These variables include the volume of muscle removed, the location of the VML injury, and the geometry of the injury, as these affect both the muscle's ability to self-regenerate as well as the probability of success of the treatment.

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) is defined as the loss of skeletal muscle tissue which exceeds the body's repair capabilities leading to sustained functional deficits over time. Some etiologies leading to VML include traumatic injuries, congenital diseases, and degenerative myopathies. Currently, the lack of standardized animal models prevents an appropriate estimation of the severity of injury capable of exceeding self-regeneration. Recent work in our laboratory has shown that a 30% VML does not create a sustained functional loss in rats after 3 months. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage threshold of muscle loss that results in permanent functional deficits. We surgically created models of 30, 40, and 50% VML injuries in the tibialis anterior (TA) of rats, and subsequently evaluated TA function and structure after a 90day recovery period. TA muscle force production was measured in situ by stimulating the sciatic nerve to obtain a maximum tetanic force. Results revealed that the maximum force produced by rats with a 30% VML was not significantly different from the uninjured muscle, while the maximum force of the 40% and 50% VML groups was significantly lower in comparison to the uninjured muscle. Overall, this study further supports our observations, suggesting that a 30% VML rat model is not suitable for VML studies. Thus, increasing VML percentages might provide an improved standardized and clinically relevant model for VML that produces a long-term deficit in muscle self-regeneration, while providing a strong base for future tissue engineering techniques in medicine.