No abstract

ObjectiveTwo techniques of duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas were compared in a prospective, randomized trial. The technical feasibility and effects on quality of life were assessed. Summary Background DataDrainage and resection are the principles of surgery in chronic pancreatitis. The techniques of duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas as described by Beger and Frey combine both to different degrees. The efficacy of both procedures has not been compared thus far. MethodsForty-two patients were allocated randomly to either Beger's (n = 20) or Frey's (n = 22) group. In addition to routine pancreatic diagnostic work-up, a multidimensional psychometric quality-of-life questionnaire and and a pain score were used. Assessment of endocrine and exocrine function included oral glucose tolerance test, serum concentrations of insulin, C-peptide, and HbA1c, as well as fecal chymotrypsin and pancreolauryl test. The interval between symptoms and surgery ranged from 12 months to 12 years, with a mean of 5.7 years. The mean follow-up was 1.5 years. ResultsThere was no mortality. Overall morbidity was 14% (20% Beger, 9% Frey). Complications from adjacent organs were resolved definitively in 94% (90% Beger, 100% Frey). A decrease of 95% and 94% of the pain score after Beger's and Frey's procedure, respectively, and an increase of 67% of the overall quality-of-life index in both groups were observed. Endocrine and exocrine function did not differ between both groups. ConclusionsBoth techniques of duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas are equally safe and effective with regard to pain relief, improvement of quality of life, and definitive control of complications affecting adjacent organs. Neither procedure leads to further deterioration of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function.

The introduction of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been one of the most remarkable steps in the field of liver transplantation (LT). First introduced for children in 1989, its adoption for adults has followed only 10 years later. As the demand for LT continues to increase, LDLT provides life-saving therapy for many patients who would otherwise die awaiting a cadaveric organ. In recent years, LDLT has been shown to be a clinically safe addition to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and has been able to significantly extend the scarce donor pool. As long as the donor shortage continues to increase, LDLT will play an important role in the future of LT.

Surgical reduction of donor livers to treat small children has been performed successfully in several centers. While this procedure improves the allocation of livers, it does not increase the organ supply. We have extended reduced-size orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) to treat 18 patients with 9 livers, accounting for 26% of our transplants during a 10-month period and have evaluated the results. In 18 split liver OLTs, patient survival was 67% and graft survival was 50%. In comparison, for 34 patients treated with full-size OLT during the same period, patient survival was 84% (p = 0.298) and graft survival was 76% (p = 0.126). Biliary complications were significantly more frequent in split grafts, occurring in 27%, as compared to 4% in full-sized grafts (p = 0.017). Primary nonfunction (4% versus 5.5%) and arterial thrombosis (6% versus 9%) occurred with similar frequency in split and full-size OLT (p = not significant). These results demonstrated that split-liver OLT is feasible and could have a substantial impact in transplant practice. We believe that biliary complications can be prevented by technical improvements and that split-liver OLT will improve transplant therapy by making more livers available.

Chronic pancreatitis frequently generates complications through involvement of adjacent organs. Distal common bile duct stenosis and segmental duodenal stenosis, the most frequent complications, are usually treated by resection or bypass procedures. This study presents experience with duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in the treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis with predominant involvement of the pancreatic head and coexisting complications involving adjacent organs. This procedure preserves the structure and function of the bile duct and duodenum. Sixty-six patients with severe chronic pancreatitis underwent duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas. Thirty-eight had associated complications of neighbouring organs: 37 had distal common bile duct stenosis, seven had duodenal stenosis, ten had evidence of segmental portal hypertension and one suffered from a pancreatopleural fistula. Details of all patients were documented prospectively; mean follow-up was 4.2 years. The complications of adjacent organs were permanently eradicated in 36 of 38 patients. Two patients required endoscopic stenting for persisting bile duct obstruction. There was substantial or complete relief of all symptoms in 35 patients. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas is effective in the treatment of severe chronic pancreatitis with predominant involvement of the pancreatic head and provides definitive management of associated complications of adjacent organs.