Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry has become standard practice in the evaluation and monitoring of patients with hematopoietic neoplasia. However, despite its widespread use, considerable variability continues to exist in the reagents used for evaluation and the format in which results are reported. As part of the 2006 Bethesda Consensus conference, a committee was formed to attempt to define a consensus set of reagents suitable for general use in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematopoietic neoplasms. The committee included laboratory professionals from private, public, and university hospitals as well as large reference laboratories that routinely operate clinical flow cytometry laboratories with an emphasis on lymphoma and leukemia immunophenotyping. A survey of participants successfully identified the cell lineage(s) to be evaluated for each of a variety of specific medical indications and defined a set of consensus reagents suitable for the initial evaluation of each cell lineage. Elements to be included in the reporting of clinical flow cytometric results for leukemia and lymphoma evaluation were also refined and are comprehensively listed. The 2006 Bethesda Consensus conference represents the first successful attempt to define a set of consensus reagents suitable for the initial evaluation of hematopoietic neoplasia. q 2007 Clinical Cytometry Society

As clinical flow cytometry practices continue to expand and immunophenotyping for leukemia and lymphoma becomes more widespread, the need for defined guidelines for training of medical professionals is imperative. Standards of expected knowledge and skills are necessary to ensure reliable test results as well as provide direction to those who are considering adding flow cytometry to their clinical laboratory practice. Before now, no clear guidelines have been established for defining the areas of responsibility, education and training standards, and credentials that would be required to perform clinical flow cytometry for leukemia and lymphoma.As part of the 2006 Bethesda Consensus conference, a committee was formed to address this need and provide recommendations for training and education. The committee included laboratory professionals from private, public, and university hospitals as well as large reference laboratories that routinely operate clinical flow cytometry laboratories with an emphasis on lymphoma and leukemia immunophenotyping. This document represents the work of the committee. Categories of work responsibility are defined and the requisite education, training, and credentials, as well as measurement methods for assessing competency for each area of responsibility are provided. Additional recommendations are included that promote creating a specialty certification in flow cytometry, establishing benchmarks for training technologists and interpreters, and offer suggestions for minimum levels of experience to direct a clinical flow cytometry laboratory. q 2007 Clinical Cytometry Society Key terms: lymphoma; leukemia; flow cytometry; education and training; credentials This document addresses issues that pertain to education and training of personnel who routinely perform clinical flow cytometry applications on lymphoma and leukemia cases. Clinical flow cytometry acquisition and analysis is, by definition, a high-complexity assay. As flow cytometry practices continue to expand, the need for defined guidelines for training of medical professionals is imperative. Errors in flow cytometry sample acquisition or data analysis can lead to misleading and unreliable results.

Despite the provision of the COG standardized analysis protocol, even experienced laboratories require an educational component for B-ALL MRD analysis by FCM. Recognition of hematogones remains challenging for some labs when using the COG protocol. The results from this study suggest that dissemination of MRD testing to other North American laboratories as part of routine clinical management of B-ALL is possible but requires additional educational components to complement standardized methodology. © 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

No abstract

Constructing a flow cytometry panel using a rigorous, objective, quantitative method permits optimization and avoids problems of interdependence and redundancy in a large, multiantigen panel.