Background Abiraterone + prednisone (abiraterone) and enzalutamide are both indicated for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to determine the best sequence in which to utilize both agents as well as their second-line efficacy. Methods In this multicentre, randomized, open-label phase II crossover trial conducted across 6 cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada, patients ≥ 18 years with newly-diagnosed mCRPC without neuroendocrine differentiation and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 were randomized 1:1 using simple randomization to receive abiraterone 1000 mg orally daily plus prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily followed by enzalutamide 160 mg orally daily (arm A), or the opposite sequence (arm B). Primary endpoints were time to second PSA progression and PSA response rate (≥ 30% decline) on second-line therapy, analyzed by intention-to-treat in randomized patients and patients that crossed over, respectively. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02125357. The trial is completed and final analyses are reported here. Findings 202 patients were randomized (101 to each arm) between October 21, 2014 and December 13, 2016. At the time of data cutoff 73 and 75 patients had crossed over in arm A and B, respectively. Time to second PSA progression was longer in arm A (median 19•3 vs 15•2 months, HR = 0•66, 95% CI 0•45-0•97, p = 0•036), at a median followup of 22•8 months (IQR 10•3-33•4). Second-line PSA response rates were 36% for enzalutamide and 4% for abiraterone (p < 0•0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (27 [27%] of 101 patients in arm A vs 18 [18%] of 101 in arm B) and fatigue (10 [10%] vs 4 [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 15 (15%) of 101 patients in arm A and 20 (20%) of 101 in arm B. There were no treatment related deaths.
Background: Glucocorticoids are often used in the treatment of nonhematologic malignancy. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of the effect of glucocorticoid therapy on nonhematologic malignancy.
A liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method has been developed and validated for the determination of the anticancer agent gemcitabine (dFdC) and its metabolite 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (dFdU) in human plasma. An Oasis((R)) HLB solid phase extraction cartridge was used for plasma sample preparation. Separation of the analytes was achieved with a YMC ODS-AQ (5 microm, 120 A, 2.0 mm x 150 mm) column. The initial composition of the mobile phase was 2% methanol/98% 5mM ammonium acetate at pH 6.8 (v/v), and the flow rate was 0.2 ml/min. An isocratic gradient was used for 3min, followed by a linear gradient over 4 min to 30% methanol/70% 5mM ammonium acetate at pH 6.8. The gradient returned to the initial conditions over 2 min and remained there for 6 min. The retention times of dFdC, dFdU, and the internal standard 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) were 11.46, 12.63, and 13.58 min. The mass spectrometer was operated under negative electrospray ionization conditions. Single-ion-monitoring (SIM) mode was used for analyte quantitation at m/z 262 for [dFdC-H](-), m/z 263 for [dFdU-H](-), and m/z 245 for [5'-DFUR-H](-). The average recoveries for dFdC, dFdU, and 5'-DFUR were 88.4, 84.6, and 99.3%, respectively. The linear calibration ranges were 5-1000 ng/ml for dFdC, and 5-5000 ng/ml for dFdU. The intra- and inter-assay precisions (%CV) were =3 and =7% at three concentration levels (50.0, 500, and 5000 ng/ml). The limits of quantitation (defined as 10 times of signal-to-noise ratio) were 3.16 ng/ml for dFdC, and 1.35 ng/ml for dFdU with 50-microl sample injections. This method has been used for measuring plasma concentrations of dFdC and dFdU in samples from adult cancer patients in a Phase I trial of weekly dFdC given as 150 (or lower) mg/(m(2) 24-h) infusion. The average plasma dFdC concentrations at 22- and 23-h into the infusion were 18.3 and 16.8 ng/ml at 150 and 100mg/m(2), respectively; the values for dFdU averaged 2950 and 1372 ng/ml.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.