Most cases of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SHL) remain idiopathic, and the majority are unilateral. From 1989 to 1993, 823 patients with sudden SHL were evaluated. Of these, 14 (1.7%) had sudden bilateral SHL. We reviewed the charts of these 14 patients to compare sudden bilateral SHL with sudden unilateral SHL. Usually, bilateral SHL was asymmetric. Most bilateral cases received combined steroid and vasodilator treatment, while unilateral cases were more likely to receive only one of these treatments. By audiological criteria, 67% of bilateral SHL cases improved, while the improvement rate in unilateral SHL was 52%; however, this difference was not statistically significant. In bilateral SHL patients showing improvement, both ears responded. Bilateral SHL patients were older at the onset of hearing loss, had a higher incidence of vascular disease, and were more likely to have positive antinuclear antibody titer. Recognition of similarities and differences between sudden unilateral and bilateral SHL can help in counseling patients.

Competing noise interferes with comprehension of connected speech for most cochlear implant patients.

Patients with acoustic neuroma may have sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Most patients with sudden hearing loss seek medical attention promptly, but the diagnosis of an acoustic neuroma may be delayed for months or years because sudden hearing loss is an unusual initial symptom of an acoustic neuroma. In a retrospective review of 836 cases of sudden hearing loss, we found 13 patients with acoustic neuromas. The prevalence of acoustic neuromas for those screened with auditory brain stem response or magnetic resonance imaging was 2.5%. In addition to these 13 patients, 79 acoustic neuroma patients treated in our clinic had well-documented sudden hearing loss as the initial symptom. Hearing loss in these 92 patients ranged from mild to profound. Associated symptoms of pain, facial paresthesia, or unilateral tinnitus preceding the sudden hearing loss were suggestive of an acoustic neuroma, as was a midfrequency (U-shaped) hearing loss. A history of other diseases or events that might explain the sudden hearing loss, a normal electronystagmogram, or recovery of hearing does not eliminate the possibility of a tumor. Because there are no clinical findings that clearly distinguish those patients with acoustic neuromas from other patients with sudden hearing loss, we recommend either an evaluation with auditory brain stem response or gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for any patient with sudden hearing loss.

Patients with acoustic neuroma may have sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Most patients with sudden hearing loss seek medical attention promptly, but the diagnosis of an acoustic neuroma may be delayed for months or years because sudden hearing loss is an unusual initial symptom of an acoustic neuroma. In a retrospective review of 836 cases of sudden hearing loss, we found 13 patients with acoustic neuromas. The prevalence of acoustic neuromas for those screened with auditory brain stem response or magnetic resonance imaging was 2.5%. In addition to these 13 patients, 79 acoustic neuroma patients treated in our clinic had well-documented sudden hearing loss as the initial symptom. Hearing loss in these 92 patients ranged from mild to profound. Associated symptoms of pain, facial paresthesia, or unilateral tinnitus preceding the sudden hearing loss were suggestive of an acoustic neuroma, as was a midfrequency (U-shaped) hearing loss. A history of other diseases or events that might explain the sudden hearing loss, a normal electronystagmogram, or recovery of hearing does not eliminate the possibility of a tumor. Because there are no clinical findings that clearly distinguish those patients with acoustic neuromas from other patients with sudden hearing loss, we recommend either an evaluation with auditory brain stem response or gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for any patient with sudden hearing loss.