OBJECTIVE:To evaluate hematological, cytogenetic and molecular responses as well as the overall, progression-free and event-free survivals of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with a third tyrosine kinase inhibitor after failing to respond to imatinib and nilotinib/dasatinib.METHODS:Bone marrow karyotyping and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction were performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after the initiation of treatment with a third tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses were defined according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. BCR-ABL1 mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing.RESULTS:We evaluated 25 chronic myeloid leukemia patients who had been previously treated with imatinib and a second tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Nine patients were switched to dasatinib, and 16 patients were switched to nilotinib as a third-line therapy. Of the chronic phase patients (n=18), 89% achieved a complete hematologic response, 13% achieved a complete cytogenetic response and 24% achieved a major molecular response. The following BCR-ABL1 mutations were detected in 6/14 (43%) chronic phase patients: E255V, Y253H, M244V, F317L (2) and F359V. M351T mutation was found in one patient in the accelerated phase of the disease. The five-year overall, progression-free and event-free survivals were 86, 54 and 22% (p<0.0001), respectively, for chronic phase patients and 66%, 66% and 0% (p<0.0001), respectively, for accelerated phase patients. All blast crisis patients died within 6 months of treatment. Fifty-six percent of the chronic phase patients lost their hematologic response within a median of 23 months.CONCLUSIONS:Although the responses achieved by the third tyrosine kinase inhibitor were not sustainable, a third tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be an option for improving patient status until a donor becomes available for transplant. Because the long-term outcome for these patients is poor, the development of new therapies for resistant chronic myeloid leukemia patients is necessary.

Early reduction of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels has been associated with improved outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. We evaluated 54 chronic-phase CML patients treated with imatinib who switched therapy to dasatinib (n = 33) or nilotinib (n = 21). BCR-ABL1 transcript levels were measured in peripheral blood using real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) every 3 months from the start of second-line treatment. Patients with BCR-ABL transcript levels >10% at 3 months and >1% at 6 months had significantly inferior progression-free (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) than patients with RQ-PCR <10% at 3 months and <1% at 6 months (66 vs. 100%, p = 0.01, and 33 vs. 73%, p = 0.02, respectively). Patients with RQ-PCR <10% at 3 months and >1% at 6 months also had inferior PFS and EFS than patients with RQ-PCR <10% at 3 months and <1% at 6 months (48 vs. 100%, p = 0.002, and 25 vs. 73%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Two measurements of BCR-ABL levels were better than a single one to stratify chronic-phase CML patients as failure after second-line therapy.

Introduction: The achievement of a deep and sustained molecular response after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is one of the requirements for therapy discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of CML patients treated with imatinib in first-line that achieve MR4.5 (BCR-ABL transcripts ≤ 0.0032% in the international scale) after imatinib treatment and the predictive factors for this response. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the rate of MMR (PCR ≤0.1%), MR4.0 (PCR ≤ 0.01%), time to molecular responses, event-free survival, progression-free and overall survival. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of CP-CML patients treated in first-line with imatinib in a single center. Patients diagnosed after 2006 were managed according to the European Leukemia Net recommendations. All patients started CML imatinib within six months from diagnosis. The type of BCR-ABL1 transcript was determined by multiplex RT-PCR from cDNA synthesized from total leukocytes RNA at diagnosis. BCR-ABL transcripts by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were assessed at baseline, and then every three months for the first year until reaching a stable major molecular response, then every 3-6 months. The SPSS software was used for the Cox Regression model for univariate and multivariate analysis, using backward Wald. The cumulative incidence was calculated with the R Program, with Gray test for curve comparisons. Event-free, progression-free and overall survivals were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the curves were compared with the log-rank test. Results: From January 2005 to December 2015 172 patients were treated with imatinib, median age 48 years (18-93), 55.8% male. Sokal score: 31% low-risk, 40% intermediate-risk and 29% high-risk. The median follow-up was 56 months (0-157). The Cumulative Incidence (CI) of MMR was 48% in 24 months and 84% in 5 years, while the CI of MR4.0 and MR4.5 was 63% and 51%, respectively, in 5 years. The median time to MMR, MR4.0 and MR4.5 was 16.7 (2-102), 31 (5-150) and 36 months (7-153), respectively. The univariate regression factors related to MR4.5 achievement were: age >48 years (HR 1.79; 95%CI: 1.08-2.98; P=0.023); days between diagnosis and imatinib start (HR=0.99; 95%CI: 0.98-0.99, P=0.020); e14a2 (b3a2) transcript (HR= 3.37; 95%CI: 1.67-6.81; P=0.001), which was the only factor in the multivariate analysis. Imatinib was discontinued in 96/172 (55.8%) patients due to resistance (36.5%), intolerance (20.8%), clinical trials (25%), death (15.6%) and adherence (2.1%). Eighteen out of 67 (26.8%) patients that achieved MR4.5 are currently participating in a discontinuation trial. Overall survival, PFS and EFS were 92%, 87% and 61% in 5 years. Conclusion: Approximately half of the patients that start imatinib in first-line obtain deep molecular responses within five years and could be candidates for treatment discontinuation. B3a2 transcript was an independent factor for MR4.5 achievement in the multivariate analysis, confirming the results of other studies that have reported earlier and deeper molecular responses in patients with b3a2 transcripts. Disclosures De Paula: Hematology and Transfusion Medicine Center, University of Campinas: Employment. Pagnano:Abbvie: Consultancy; EMS: Other: Financial support for participation in congress; Shire: Other: Lecture; Novartis: Consultancy.

Several trials have demonstrated the feasibility of discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) with deep molecular response. Aims: to report the results of two Brazilian imatinib (IM) discontinuation trials and to evaluate factors impacting in treatment-free remission (TFR) and treatment-free survival (TFS) after IM discontinuation. Methods:Between September 2016 and January 2019, 60 CML pts were included in two ongoing phase II, single arm, prospective Brazilian discontinuation trials: Pilot Study of Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Deep Molecular Response - Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Treatment-free Remission (TFR) (EDI-PIO UNICAMP)(NCT02852486)and Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase With Sustained MR4log(USP) (NCT03239886). Inclusion criteria: age >18 years, chronic phase, minimum of 3 years of IM therapy, deep molecular response for ≥ 2 years (confirmed by 4 tests in the last 2 years, defined as MR4.0 in USP trial and MR4.5 in EDI-PIO). Patients participating in EDI-PIO trial used pioglitazone 30 mg/day plus IM for 3 months before IM discontinuation (n=30). After discontinuation, pts were monitored by quantitative RQ-PCR monthly in the first year, every 2 months in the second year and every 3 months in the third year. Criteria for IM re-initiation: loss of MMR (in one test), loss of cytogenetic response, loss of hematologic response, disease progression or confirmed loss of MR4.0 (this criteria used only in EDI-PIO trial). TFR was calculated from the date of discontinuation until first event (loss of MMR; IM reintroduction; death any cause or last follow-up); TFS was calculated from the date of IM discontinuation until reintroduction or last follow-up (censoring deaths not related to CML). Adverse events after IM discontinuation were reported according to CTCAE. Results:Data cut-off for analysis was February 2019. In the 1stanalysis 48 pts who discontinued IM in MR4.5 were analyzed. Patient's characteristics from EDIPIO (n=30) and USP (n=18) trials were: 57% vs. 67% male, median age of 55 (29-77) and 56 (33-95) years (29-95) at discontinuation; 16% and 33% had used previously Interferon; median duration of IM treatment of 10 (3-16) vs. 10 (5-15) years; median duration of MMR 95 (30-149) vs. 93 (57-130) months; MR4.0 was 90 (26-135) vs. 89 (30-123) months; and MR4.5 was 76 (23-135) vs. 75 (30-102) months; none variable had statistical difference.One patient died in MMR due to cardiac failure. TFR was 61% (95% CI 47-75) at 20 months. Sixteen (33%) out 48 re-initiated IM (2 with confirmed loss of MR4.0 and 14 with loss of MMR) in a median time of 20 (1-26) months. All relapsed pts recovered MMR after IM reintroduction, in a median time of 2 months (0-4). There was no transformation to advanced phases. No serious adverse events were reported during pioglitazone treatment. In the Cox regression the duration of MMR was associated with a longer TFR HR: 0.96 (beta-) (CI 95%:0.94-0.99, P= 0.006). Gender, age at diagnosis, age at discontinuation, treatment with pioglitazone, Sokal and EUTOS scores, BCR-ABL transcripts type, duration of IM therapy, duration of MR4.0 and MR4.5 and previous use of Interferon did not affect TFR.In the second analysis all 60 pts were included. TFS was 56% and was higher in pts who discontinued IM in sustained MR4.5 vs. MR4.0 (63% vs. 33%, P=0.04)(Figure). The independent factors for TFR in the multivariate analysis by Cox-regression were the duration of MMR [HR: 0.97 (beta-), 95%CI: 0.95-0.98, P=0.001] and intermediate/high risk Sokal [HR 3.14 95%CI: 1.08-9.11, P= 0.035]. Twenty-four out of 60 pts (40%) re-initiated IM (2 with confirmed loss of MR4.0 and 22 with loss of MMR).Adverse events occurred in 38 (63%) pts, 30% attributed to withdrawal syndrome. Some pts presented more than one event. Grade 1-2: arthralgia or muscular pain (17), hyperglycemia (4), hypertriglyceridemia (2), polycythemia (2), hypertension (3), and others (11). Four pts had grade 3-4 event: arthralgia (1), death for cardiac failure (1), abortion and hypertriglyceridemia (1). Conclusions:both trials demonstrated the feasibility and safety of IM discontinuation in pts in sustained deep molecular response. The duration of MMR was associated with a higher TFR and TFS rate. Imatinib discontinuation was more successful in pts in stable MR4.5. Figure Disclosures Pagnano: Pint Pharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy. Delamain:Novartis: Honoraria.

Preliminary reports demonstrated that pioglitazone, an antidiabetic drug that is agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) was able to reduce expression of STAT5 and its downstream targets HIF2α and CITED2, which are key guardians of the quiescence and stemness of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) leukemia stem cells (LSCs). Leaving quiescence would turn the LSCs more sensitive to imatinib (IM) and cause an erosion of the LSCs. This was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo in CML patients that achieved complete molecular response after pioglitazone use. This was the rational for the design of EDI-PIO trial (Pilot Study of Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Deep Molecular Response - Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Treatment-Free Remission) (NCT02852486). In this trial, pioglitazone was given in association with IM, with the aim to pull out the LSCs from the quiescence and sensitizing them to IM effect, increasing treatment-free remission (TFR) rates after treatment interruption. Aims: to evaluate PPAR-γ, STAT5, HIF2α and CITED2 gene expression before and after pioglitazone use in CML patients with criteria for IM discontinuation Patients and methods: EDI-PIO is a prospective, phase II trial. Inclusion criteria: CML in chronic phase, treated with IM for at least 3 years, with stable deep molecular response (MR4.5) for at least 2 years. Patients received pioglitazone 30 mg/day, orally, for 3 months before IM discontinuation. BCR-ABL levels were measured by real-time quantitative PCR monthly in the first year after discontinuation, every two months in the second year, and then every 3 months during the subsequent follow-up. Imatinib was reinitiated at molecular relapse (loss of major molecular response or confirmed loss of MR4.0). Total RNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes, pre and post pioglitazone, and at 3 and 6 months after IM discontinuation. After cDNA synthesis, an aliquot was used for gene expression analysis by reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), using specific primers for PPAR-γ, STAT5, HIF2α and CITED2. The relative gene expression was calculated using the equation, 2-ΔΔCT. GAPDH was used as control gene. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA. Treatment-free remission (TFR) was calculated from IM discontinuation until molecular relapse, reintroduction of IM by any cause, progression to advanced phases or death to any cause. Results: The study is closed for enrollment. Between June 2016 and January 2019, 32 chronic phase CML patients were recruited, of which 30 patients were included in gene expression analysis. Median age was 55 years at trial initiation; 56.7% were men, 50% low risk Sokal and the median time of IM treatment was 117 months (41-191). The median follow-up time was 20 months. TFR was 60% at 24 months. Eleven patients relapsed and IM was reintroduced, but none presented hematologic relapse or progression to advanced phases. There was no significant difference in STAT5, PPAR-γ, HIF2α and CITED2 expression pre and post pioglitazone, at 3 and 6 months after IM discontinuation. No difference was found in the comparison of the relapsed vs. non-relapsed group. Conclusions: pioglitazone did not affect STAT5, PPAR-γ, HIF2α and CITED2 gene expression in this group of pts with deep molecular response. The ACTIM trial demonstrated a reduction in STAT5 expression in bone marrow cells 6 months after pioglitazone exposure, but pioglitazone was given to pts with MMR, without MR4.0. There was no difference in gene expression in the groups with or without molecular relapse. TFR rates remains similar to those reported in other discontinuation trials. Disclosures Delamain: Novartis: Honoraria. Pagnano:Sandoz: Consultancy; Pint Pharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy.