In the experimental animal chronic hyperglycemia alters the islet's sensitivity to glucose. In the present study the glucose sensitivity of human pancreatic islets, isolated and purified, obtained from seven human pancreases using an automated method was evaluated. After a 12-h stabilization period, islets were cultured for 48 h in normal (5.5 mmol/L) or high glucose (16.7 mmol/L) medium. Islets were then perifused to study their insulin response to glucose. Islets cultured in the high glucose medium lost glucose-induced insulin release and, when challenged with an acute fall of glucose concentration in the perifusate, showed a paradoxical insulin release. Insulin release in response to 10 mmol/L L-arginine was preserved in these islets, suggesting a selective reduction of the insulin response to glucose. An additional 48-h culture in 5.5 mmol/L glucose medium partially restored the sensitivity to glucose of the previously unresponsive islets. These findings indicate that short term exposure to high glucose concentrations induces a selective glucose insensitivity of human islets, which can be partially reversed by an additional culture in normal glucose medium.
Aims
According to cardiovascular outcome trials, some sodium‐glucose contransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RA) are recommended for secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this real‐world study, we compared the simultaneous reductions in HbA1c, body weight and systolic blood pressure after initiation of dapagliflozin or GLP‐1RA as second or a more advanced line of therapy.
Materials and methods
DARWIN‐T2D was a retrospective multi‐centre study conducted at diabetes specialist clinics in Italy that compared T2D patients who initiated dapagliflozin or GLP‐1RA (exenatide once weekly or liraglutide). Data were collected at baseline and at the first follow‐up visit after 3 to 12 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a simultaneous reduction in HbA1c, body weight and systolic blood pressure. To reduce confounding, we used multivariable adjustment (MVA) or propensity score matching (PSM).
Results
Totals of 473 patients initiating dapagliflozin and 336 patients initiating GLP‐1RA were included. The two groups differed in age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, weight and concomitant medications. The median follow‐up was 6 months in both groups. Using MVA or PSM, the primary endpoint was observed in 30% to 32% of patients, with no difference between groups. Simultaneous reduction of HbA1c, BP and SBP by specific threshold, as well as achievement of final goals, did not differ between groups. GLP‐1RA reduced HbA1c by 0.3% more than the reduction achieved with dapagliflozin.
Conclusion
In routine specialist care, initiation of dapagliflozin can be as effective as initiation of a GLP‐1RA for attainment of combined risk factor goals.
Several peptide hormones are effective when administered intranasally (in); these include oxytocin, vasopressin, insulin, glucagon, and calcitonin. With regard to GHRH and CRH, previous studies demonstrated that their bioavailability following in administration was very low. In this study we evaluated the serum GH response to 50 micrograms GHRH iv and to 700 micrograms GHRH in, the latter given alone and with 5 and 15 mg sodium-glycocholate (SGC), a surfactant, in six normal men. The bioavailability of in GHRH, calculated as net GH secretory area, was very low, and increased to 7% that of iv GHRH when SGC was used. In the same men, 50 micrograms CRH was administered both iv and in, alone and with 5 and 15 mg SGC. The bioavailability of in CRH, calculated as net cortisol secretory area, was very low and increased to 100% that of iv CRH when 15 mg SGC was used. These data indicate that the efficacy of GHRH and CRH administered in is significantly augmented by SGC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.