The conversion of theoretical, as well as geometric heights to practical heights requires the application of geoidal undulations from a geoid model. The various global geopotential models that are readily available for application in any part of the world do not best-fit regions, as well as countries. As a result, there is a need to determine the local geoid models of local areas, regions and countries. This study determines the local geoid model of Kampala in Uganda for orthometric heights computation by comparing three plane geometric geoid surfaces. A total of 19 points were used in the study. The least squares adjustment technique was applied to compute the models’ parameters. Microsoft Excel programs were developed for the application of the models in the study area. The Root Mean Square Index was applied to compute the accuracy of the models. The three geometric geoid models were compared using their accuracy to determine which of them is most suitable for application in the study area. The comparison results show that the three models can be applied in the study area with more reliability, with greater confidence in model 2.

No abstract

The importance of the local geoid model for the computation of accurate geoid heights, as well as orthometric heights used for engineering constructions, necessitated its establishment in areas, regions or countries. Consequently, this study establishes the local geometric geoid model of Busoga, Uganda, using the geometric method. A total of 26 points were used in the study, 20 points for the development of the model and 6 test points. GNSS observations were acquired with Trimble GNSS dual-frequency receivers and processed with Bernese (V5.2) and Spectra Precision Survey Office (v4.1) software to obtain the coordinates and ellipsoidal heights of the points. Differences between the existing orthometric and ellipsoidal heights were computed to obtain the geoid heights. The Least squares adjustment technique was applied to determine the fit, as well as the Bicubic and Multiquadratic models’ parameters. The Root Mean Squares Error (RMSE) index was used to compute the accuracy of the models. The geoid models were compared with their RMSE, as well as accuracy to determine which of them is more suitable for application in the study area. The comparison result shows that the Multiquadratic geoid model is more suitable for implementation in the study area. A Microsoft Excel program was developed for the application of the model in the study area.