IntroductionPremix insulin analogs are a well-established treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, there is a lack of simple, clear guidance on some aspects of their use. These include choosing a regimen for insulin initiation, recognizing when patients need intensification of therapy, and switching from basal–bolus to a premix insulin analog when appropriate.MethodsAn independent expert panel formulated recommendations on the use in T2D of the premix insulin analog formulations widely available in Australasia, based on the available evidence and their own experience.ResultsResults from trials in both initiation and intensification of insulin show that no single insulin or regimen is best on all endpoints, and that improved glycemic control can be expected regardless of which regimen is used. Thus, individual patient factors and preferences become more important. Guidance is presented to help the clinician choose between a premix insulin analog or basal analog for insulin initiation, and to intensify insulin therapy using premix insulin analogs. Recommendations are made on dosing, titration, the concomitant use of non-insulin glucose-lowering drugs, and other practical issues, and on the special case of switching from basal–bolus to premix insulin analog therapy.ConclusionThis guidance is intended to help both general and specialist practitioners make informed choices and provide optimal care for patients with T2D. It emphasizes the importance of taking into account individual patient factors and preferences so that the choice of insulin regimen is individualized to the patient in the same way that glycemic targets are now individualized.FundingNovo Nordisk Region IO A/S.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0116-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is an autoimmune condition caused by untreated Group A Streptococcal (GAS) infection of the upper respiratory tract (and possibly skin). Multiple or severe attacks of ARF can cause cardiac damage known as rheumatic heart disease (RHD). The most effective recommended treatment of ARF requires monthly intramuscular injections of Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) known as secondary prophylaxis. The goal of secondary prophylaxis is to prevent GAS infections that may lead to the recurrence of ARF. Rates of adherence to secondary prophylaxis schedules are usually low due to the frequency and duration of injection, pain and access to proper and timely healthcare services. A less painful and longer acting BPG formulation would ideally help prevent ARF recurrence and improve compliance rates to this schedule. The purpose of this work is to explore the BPG reformulation preferences of children and teens currently receiving monthly BPG intramuscular injections, in addition to their families and healthcare providers. A software application has been developed that will explore the experiences of the groups who will then choose their ideal BPG formulation from a range of plausible formulations and associated dosing regimens. The software application has been optimized for use to ensure age and cultural appropriateness and also efficient data collection. Pretesting of the software has been undertaken which has received positive responses with the piloting stage initiated. This is the first time a software application has been successfully developed to collect qualitative and quantitative data on individual preferences for BPG formulations and dosing regimens.

No abstract

Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) is an autoimmune condition resulting from untreated Group A Streptococcal (GAS) infection of the upper respiratory tract and possibly skin. Repeated untreated and severe episodes of ARF can cause permanent cardiac damage known as Rheumatic Heart Disease (RHD). Rates of ARF in New Zealand and Australia are among the highest in the world, particularly amongst Māori and Pacific and Indigenous Aboriginal children. Monthly injections of Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) are given intramuscularly to prevent GAS infections that can lead to ARF and cause RHD. Early studies exploring the Pharmacokinetics (PK) properties of BPG were conducted in healthy, fit, young military recruits without ARF/RHD. BPG bioavailability, metabolism may differ in paediatric populations groups with ARF who have comorbidities and vary in Body Mass Index. This project seeks to determine the PK characteristics in a paediatric population currently receiving monthly injections of BPG while at the same time monitoring antibody immune responses to possible GAS infections. This is a prospective cohort study in a paediatric population of Wellington based children and teens (aged 5–21 years of predominantly Pasifika and Māori heritage) with a previous diagnosis of ARF and are receiving monthly BPG injections via community services. Participants will contribute finger prick blood samples over time for Dried Blood Spot assays designed to quantify penicillin G levels in the blood and measure streptococcal serology. Routine throat swab samples will also be collected with ASOT antibody levels monitored for GAS breakthrough infections. This is the first population PK study exploring use of BPG in Māori and Pacific children previously diagnosed with ARF.