The main challenge of evaluating droughts in the context of climate change and linking these droughts to adverse societal outcomes is a lack of a uniform definition that identifies drought conditions at a location and time. The U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM), created in 1999, is a well-established composite index that combines drought indicators across the hydrological cycle (i.e., meteorological to hydrological) with information from local experts. This makes the USDM one of the most holistic measures for evaluating past drought conditions across the United States. In this study, the USDM was used to define drought events as consecutive periods in time where the USDM status met or exceeded D1 conditions over the past 20 years. This analysis was applied to 5 km grid cells covering the U.S. and Puerto Rico to characterize the frequency, duration, and intensification rates of drought, and the timing of onset, amelioration, and other measures for every drought event on record. Results from this analysis revealed stark contrasts in the evolution of drought across the United States. Over the western United States, droughts evolved much slower, resulting in longer-lasting but fewer droughts. The eastern United States experienced more frequent, shorter-duration events. Given the slower evolution from onset to drought peak, flash droughts, which made up 9.8% of all droughts, were less common across the western United States, with a greater frequency over the southern United States. The most severe drought event on record was the 2012 drought, when more than 21% of the United States experienced its largest number of weeks at or above extreme (D3) drought conditions. The availability of historical drought events would support future societal impacts studies relating drought to adverse outcomes and aid in the evaluation of mitigation strategies by providing a dataset to local decision makers to compare and evaluate past droughts.
Agricultural drought has traditionally been monitored using indices based on above ground measures of temperature and precipitation that have lengthy historical records. However, the period-of-record length for soil moisture networks are becoming sufficient enough to standardize and evaluate soil moisture anomalies and percentiles that are spatially and temporally independent of local soil type, topography, and climatology. To explore these standardized measures in the context of drought, the U. S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) hourly standardized soil moisture anomalies and percentiles were evaluated against changes in the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) status, with a focus on onset, worsening, and improving drought conditions. The purpose of this study was to explore timescales (i.e., 1 to 6 weeks) and soil moisture at individual (i.e., 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 cm) and aggregated layer (i.e., Top and Column) depths to determine those that were more closely align with evolving drought conditions. Results indicated that the upper-level depths (5, 10, and 20 cm, and Top layer aggregate) and shorter averaging periods were more responsive to changes in USDM drought status. This was particularly evident during the initial and latter stages of drought when USDM status changes were thought to be more aligned with soil moisture conditions. This indicates that standardized measures of soil moisture can be useful in drought monitoring and forecasting applications during these critical stages of drought formation and amelioration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.