Hypoalbuminemia is the result of the combined effects of inflammation and inadequate protein and caloric intake in patients with chronic disease such as chronic renal failure. Inflammation and malnutrition both reduce albumin concentration by decreasing its rate of synthesis, while inflammation alone is associated with a greater fractional catabolic rate (FCR) and, when extreme, increased transfer of albumin out of the vascular compartment. A vicious cascade of events ensues in which inflammation induces anorexia and reduces the effective use of dietary protein and energy intake and augments catabolism of the key somatic protein, albumin. Hypoalbuminemia is a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with chronic renal failure, and the major cause of death in this population is due to cardiovascular events. Inflammation is associated with vascular disease and likely causes injury to the vascular endothelium, and hypoalbuminemia as two separate expressions of the inflammatory process. Albumin has a myriad of important physiologic effects that are essential for normal health. However, simply administering albumin to critically ill patients with hypoalbuminemia has not been shown to improve survival or reduce morbidity. Thus the inference from these clinical studies suggests that the cause of hypoalbuminemia, rather than low albumin levels specifically, is responsible for morbidity and mortality.

No abstract

Extended daily dialysis (EDD) is an easily implemented alternative to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Since EDD offers most of the advantages of CRRT, we sought to compare the effectiveness of these two modalities. In this 2-year study, 54 ICU patients with ARF were treated with either continuous hemodialysis (CHD) or EDD. Oliguria was present in 64% of patients who received CHD vs. 73% of EDD patients (p=NS) while 93% of CHD and 81% of EDD patients required mechanical ventilation (p=NS). Patients treated with EDD were younger than those who received CHD (47.0 ± 12.6 vs. 56.7 ± 13.7, p=0.009), but there were no significant differences in gender or mean APACHE II scores at the time of randomization. Mean arterial blood pressures measured during treatment were maintained between 70 and 80 mmHg for both EDD and CHD and average daily serum electrolyte levels fell within normal ranges for EDD and CHD. Average daily fluid input and output were 5.8 ± 3.3L and 6.0 ± 3.2 L for CHD vs. 3.3 ± 2.6 and 3.0 ± 1.7 L for EDD after exclusion of data from 2 burn patients. Hourly heparin anticoagulation rates were 1080 U/hour for CHD and 643 U/hour for EDD, p=0.02. Anticoagulation-free treatments were performed during 43% of all EDD treatments vs. 21% of all CHD treatments, p<0.001. Clotting of the dialyzer or circuit occurred at least once during 51% of all CHD treatment days vs. 22% of EDD treatments (p<0.001). We conclude that EDD is a safe, effective alternative to CRRT that offers comparable hemodynamic stability and excellent small solute control.

No abstract