A female mouflon, weighing 40 kilograms, was submitted to the diagnostic laboratory of the Institute of Veterinary Medicine of Serbia for determining the potential cause of death. Necropsy revealed massive hemorrhages in subcutaneous and intermuscular tissue and on papillary muscle. Petechiae and ecchymoses were found on the omentum, mesentery and adipose tissue of heart, kidney and costal pleura. Haemorrhagic-necrotic enteritis in duodenum and jejunum was characterized by catarrhal hemorrhagic inflammation with the presence of mucous and bloody content, whereas gas bubbles in the submucosa have also been confirmed. Bacterial cultures from sampled organs were identified as Clostridium perfringens type A, Clostridium septicum, and Clostridium sordelli. Based on the established pathological and histological changes and the results of the bacteriological, biochemical, and molecular examination, the state of septic shock and toxemia with disseminated massive bleeding was  the immediate cause of mouflon death. The septic condition is a consequence of enterotoxemia caused by Clostridium perfringens type A, Clostridium septicum, and Clostridium sordelli infection.

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most economically important diseases in pigs, worldwide. Just in the US, the total costs to the swine industry have been estimated at $664 million per year. Therefore, the continuous and reliable monitoring of the PRRS status of a pig herd is required in order to prevent and reduce costs due to this infection. Mostly used methods for diagnosis of PRRS infection nowadays are serological (ELISA) and molecular (PCR) ones. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of three different commercially available ELISA kits for detection of antibodies against PRRSV (IDEXX PRRS X3 Ab Test (IDEXX, USA), INgezim PRRS Universal (Ingenasa, Spain), Pigtype PRRSV Ab (Qiagen, Germany)) using 91 blood serum samples collected from pigs in Serbia. Our study showed no significant differences in specificity and sensitivity between three commercially available ELISA kits. However, IDEXX ELISA proved to be more reliable kit for detecting antibodies against PRRSV with sensitivity of 97,4% and specificity of 98,1%, considering INgezim and Qiagen kits specificity of 92,5% and 83%, respectively, and sensitivity of 94,7 % for both kits. In order to achieve maximal reliability of obtained results, ELISA diagnostic protocol for diagnosis of PRRS infection should be complemented with additional tests such as PCR and virus neutralization test.