Background: Prior studies of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) employed a 3-lead Optimizer system. A new 2-lead system eliminated the need for an atrial lead. This study tested the safety and effectiveness of this 2-lead system compared with the 3-lead system. Methods: Patients with New York Heart Association III/IVa symptoms despite medical therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction 25% to 45%, and not eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy could participate. All subjects received an Optimizer 2-lead implant. The primary end point was the estimated difference in the change of peak VO 2 from baseline to 24 weeks between FIX-HF-5C2 (2-lead system) subjects relative to control subjects from the prior FIX-HF-5C (3-lead system) study. Changes in New York Heart Association were a secondary end point. The primary safety end point was a comparison of device-related adverse events between FIX-HF-5C2 and FIX-HF-5C subjects. Results: Sixty subjects, 88% male, 66±9 years old with left ventricular ejection fraction 34±6% were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between FIX-HF-5C and FIX-HF-5C2 subjects except that 15% of FIX-HF-5C2 subjects had permanent atrial fibrillation versus 0% in FIX-HF-5C. CCM delivery did not differ significantly between 2- and 3-lead systems (19 892±3472 versus 19 583±4998 CCM signals/day, CI of difference [−1228 to 1847]). The change of peak VO 2 from baseline to 24 weeks was 1.72 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 1.02–2.42) mL/kg per minute greater in the 2-lead device group versus controls. 83.1% of 2-lead subjects compared with 42.7% of controls experienced ≥1 class New York Heart Association improvement ( P <0.001). There were decreased Optimizer-related adverse events with the 2-lead system compared with the 3-lead system (0% versus 8%; P =0.03). Conclusions: The 2-lead system effectively delivers comparable amount of CCM signals (including in subjects with atrial fibrillation) as the 3-lead system, is equally safe and improves peak VO 2 and New York Heart Association. Device-related adverse effects are less with the 2-lead system. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03339310
Background Patients with a functionally univentricular heart and a Fontan palliation are prone to a wide range of extra-cardiac complications. Lymphopenia and immunoglobulin deficiency are insufficiently characterized in this population. Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze prevalence and associations of lymphopenia and immunoglobulin deficiency in a cohort of adult Fontan patients. Methods Ninety-five consecutive patients with a Fontan circulation that were seen at our institution between 2011 and 2021 were screened. Laboratory results and clinical characteristics were extracted from the patient's charts. Results Fifty-five patients (47% male) underwent evaluation of lymphocyte and/or immunoglobulin subpopulations at a mean age of 28.9±9.7 years. Baseline characteristics are depicted in the Table. Seven patients (7/55, 12.7%) had immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels below the lower limit of normal (i.e. <7.0 g/l). Patients with IgG deficiency had a higher prevalence of protein-losing enteropathy (43% versus 4%, p=0.001). Fifteen patients (15/52, 28.8%) had lymphocyte counts below the lower limit of normal (i.e. <850/μl). Lymphocyte counts and lymphocyte subpopulations were comparable in groups with and without protein-losing enteropathy. There was a moderately positive correlation between absolute lymphocyte counts and IgG levels (r=0.301, p=0.032). In a subgroup of 24 patients that underwent liver biopsy, there was no difference in terms of absolute lymphocyte counts and immunoglobulin subpopulations in patients with a low (i.e. 1–2) and high (i.e. 3–4) congestive hepatic fibrosis score. Conclusion IgG deficiency is present in 13% of patients with a Fontan circulation and seems to be associated with the presence of protein-losing enteropathy. Lymphopenia is more common and occurs in a quarter of all patients with a Fontan circulation; however, its etiology is likely more complex and multifactorial. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.