The atomic exchange effect has previously been demonstrated to have a great influence at low energy in the 241 Pu β − transition. The screening effect has been given as a possible explanation for a remaining discrepancy. Improved calculations have been made to consistently evaluate these two atomic effects, compared here to the recent high precision measurements of 241 Pu and 63 Ni β spectra. In this paper, a new screening correction has been defined to account for the spatial extension of the electron wave functions. Excellent overall agreement of about 1% from 500 eV to the endpoint energy has been obtained for both β spectra, which demonstrates that a rather simple β decay model for allowed transitions, including atomic effects within an independent particles model, is sufficient to describe well the current most precise measurements.
The exchange effect has been previously given as a possible explanation for a significant deviation from an allowed shape observed at low energy in the 241 Pu β spectrum. Calculations set out here confirm that this atomic effect explains a large part of this deviation. The equations needed to calculate the exchange effect are detailed, as well as the evaluation of the confluent hypergeometric function for complex arguments of large magnitudes. After a review of the possible other effects that could explain the remaining discrepancy at low energy, the screening correction using effective nuclear charges seems to be the best explanation. For radionuclides with high Z, this work has demonstrated the necessity to take into account the spatial variation of the nuclear charge experienced by the ejected electron to accurately correct for the screening effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.