To investigate the relation between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigenemia and clinical manifestations of HIV infections, we studied 96 patients with hemophilia who were positive for HIV antibody, for a median of 34 months. Every 4 to 10 months a clinical and laboratory examination was performed and serum samples were tested for three HIV markers: HIV antigen, antibody to p24, and antibody to gp41. Twenty-two subjects (23 percent) were found to be positive for HIV antigen: 8 were positive upon entry and remained so (Group 1), and 14 became positive during the study, 4 to 26 months after HIV antibody appeared (seroconversion), 13 of whom remained positive for HIV antigen (Group 2). Most subjects positive for HIV antigen had low or undetectable titers of antibody to p24, whereas the antibody titer to gp41 remained high. In Group 2, patients with low p24 antibody titers had further decreases in their titers before or at the time HIV antigen appeared. Once present, HIV antigen persisted and tended to increase in concentration. In contrast to Group 3 (negative for HIV antigen, low anti-p24 titer) and 4 (negative for HIV antigen, high anti-p24 titer), the groups positive for HIV antigen had significantly higher incidences of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (P = 0.05), immunodeficiency-related infections (P less than 0.001), and immune thrombocytopenia (P = 0.001), and had more severe disease as measured by the Walter Reed staging system (P less than 0.001). In this study, HIV antigen appeared to be a better predictive marker of HIV-related complications than the absolute T4+ count. These results suggest that HIV antigenemia indicates a poor clinical prognosis.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Skin and bone share similarities in terms of biochemical composition.Some authors have hypothesized that their properties could evolve concomitantly with age, allowing the estimation of the parameters of one from those of the other.We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the correlation between skin and bone parameters in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.Fourteen studies – including 1974 patients – were included in the review.Three of these studies included two groups of participants – osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic – in order to compare skin parameters between them: two studies found a significant difference between the two groups and one did not.Eleven of these studies included one population of interest and compared its skin and bone parameters in a continuous manner: eight studies compared dermal thickness to bone mineral density (seven found a significant correlation [R = 0.19–0.486] and one did not); two studies compared skin elasticity to bone mineral density (both found a significant correlation [R = 0.44–0.57); and one study compared skin collagen to bone mineral density and found a significant correlation (R = 0.587).It can be assumed that the estimation of skin alterations from ageing could help in estimating concomitant bone alterations.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:449-460. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.160088